[{"id":126,"date":"2020-07-28T13:40:52","date_gmt":"2020-07-28T17:40:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/?p=126"},"modified":"2020-08-12T10:22:18","modified_gmt":"2020-08-12T14:22:18","slug":"big-data-learning-analytics-and-the-role-of-assessment-in-online-learning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/2020\/07\/28\/big-data-learning-analytics-and-the-role-of-assessment-in-online-learning\/","title":{"rendered":"Big Data, Learning Analytics and the Role of Assessment in Online Learning"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Higher education is facing a number of challenges in the twenty-first century. Some of the top challenges include declining student enrollments, financial difficulties, and decreased state funding, to name a few (Wiley Education Services, n.d.). In a 2016 survey by the Babson Survey Research Group, two-thirds of academic leaders polled said that online education is integral to their strategic plan.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, online enrollment trends are on the rise. A report from the Education Department&#8217;s Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System shows that the number of students taking at least one online class at either a public or private nonprofit institution increased from 30 percent in 2017 (Ginder, Kelly-Reid, &amp; Mann, 2018) to 31.6 percent in 2018 (US Department of Education, 2019). The number of students enrolled exclusively online increased from 30.4 percent in 2017 (Ginder, Kelly-Reid, &amp; Mann, 2018) to 32.5 percent in 2018 (US Department of Education, 2019). While the rate of growth seems to\u00a0be decelerating when compared to previous years, online education continues to fuel\u00a0the\u00a0growth in overall enrollment in higher education\u00a0(Lederman, 2019).<\/p>\n<p>Despite the popularity of online learning for students, perceptions of quality still remain for academic leaders. In a 2015 survey, 29 percent of chief academic officers polled believed\u00a0online classes are\u00a0not as valuable as face to face classes (Allen, Seaman, Poulin, &amp; Straut, 2016). The larger body of research, however, shows no significant difference in student learning outcomes when comparing the two modalities (Cavanaugh &amp; Jacquemin, 2015; Kemp &amp; Grieve, 2014). In fact, some studies show that online students may even outperform their face to face learner counterparts (Means, Toyoma, Murphy, Bakia, Jones, 2009). Regardless of the medium, quality course design is imperative\u00a0to maximize student learning (Muller, Gradel, Deane, Forte, McCabe, Pickett, Piorkowski, Scalzo, &amp; Sullivan, 2019). Furthermore, assessment of student learning is a critical competency of online educators (Martin, Kiran, Kumar, &amp; Ritzhaupt, 2019).<\/p>\n<p>In this literature review, I plan to explore innovations in the assessment of online learning, particularly with the use of big data and learning analytics. In an era of heightened accountability and decreasing student enrollments, Dringus (2012) argues that higher education is especially interested in big data and learning analytics as it relates to student learning online.<\/p>\n<p>As a full-time faculty member in a fully online master&#8217;s degree program, I have seen first-hand how engaging and rewarding online teaching and learning can be. I am disheartened by the negative perceptions of online learning despite the body of research to support that learning outcomes are similar between the modes of delivery. With the proliferation of technology and web tools available to support online learning efforts, I am interested in the concepts of big data and learning analytics (LA). More specifically, I am interested in how these concepts can be leveraged to assess student learning in the online classroom.<\/p>\n<h2>Big Data in Business<\/h2>\n<p>Living in the digital age, technology is pervasive. People today have GPS devices on their smartphones, watches that can track and monitor their heart rates, and televisions that can predict viewing habits. A digital footprint is created every time you log on to or engage in\u00a0a transaction on a digital device\u00a0(Marr, 2017). This digital footprint is translated into a data set that can be sorted, quantified, and analyzed\u00a0in order\u00a0to understand the user&#8217;s behavior (Yupangco, 2017).<\/p>\n<p>For example, in my preliminary search for information on big data, I explored some mainstream articles to better understand how the business sector\u00a0might be using big data analytics to drive decision making. While reading an article\u00a0on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/article\/325923\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/article\/325923\">Entrepreneur.com<\/a>,\u00a0I took a screenshot to capture the image, as well as the\u00a0pop-up, that emerged on my screen:<\/p>\n<div id=\"element_1113099\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1113099\" class=\"element_body lv_162\">\n<div id=\"attachment_127\" style=\"width: 686px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-127\" class=\"wp-image-127 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.12.33-PM-e1595956485475-1024x452.png\" alt=\"image of pop-up while shopping on Amazon\" width=\"676\" height=\"298\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.12.33-PM-e1595956485475-1024x452.png 1024w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.12.33-PM-e1595956485475-300x133.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.12.33-PM-e1595956485475-768x339.png 768w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.12.33-PM-e1595956485475-600x265.png 600w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.12.33-PM-e1595956485475-945x417.png 945w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.12.33-PM-e1595956485475.png 1458w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-127\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Balkhi, 2019)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The timing of the pop-up message shown above was impeccable. Not only does this image showcase a practical example of\u00a0how Amazon uses data to upsell customers based on the purchasing history of previous buyers, but the pop-up at the bottom of the screen also reads:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Entrepreneur Media, Inc. values your privacy. In order to understand how people use our site generally, and to create more valuable experiences for you, we may collect data about your use of this site (both directly and through our partners). By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to the use of that data. For more information on our data policies, please visit our Privacy Policy (Entrepreneur, n.d.).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1115668\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1115668\" class=\"element_body lv_184\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1113100\" class=\"element_body lv_99\">\n<p>As technology permeates the lives of people around the world, there is a tremendous amount of data to be harvested (Watson, Wilson, Drew, &amp; Thompson, 2017). In the corporate sector, this\u00a0data is used by large companies to improve business practices\u00a0and, ultimately, to bolster the bottom line.<\/p>\n<p>In a\u00a02017 article on Harvard Business Review online, the author shares\u00a0more\u00a0specific examples of how fortune 1000 businesses are using big data. As seen in the graphic below, the top three areas where\u00a0businesses are realizing\u00a0the most value from collecting and analyzing data are in\u00a0decreasing expenses, fostering innovation, and launching new products or services (Bean, 2017).<\/p>\n<div id=\"asset_262802\" class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_128\" style=\"width: 686px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-128\" class=\"wp-image-128 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.17.06-PM-1024x568.png\" alt=\"bar graph of how 1000 executives report using big data\" width=\"676\" height=\"375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.17.06-PM-1024x568.png 1024w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.17.06-PM-300x166.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.17.06-PM-768x426.png 768w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.17.06-PM-600x333.png 600w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.17.06-PM-945x524.png 945w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.17.06-PM.png 1510w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-128\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Bean, 2017)<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"asset_261364\" class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1115668\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1115668\" class=\"element_body lv_184\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1113100\" class=\"element_body lv_99\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>These concepts are further explained in a blog by the College of William and Mary&#8217;s Raymond A. Mason School of Business\u00a0(n.d.). Here, the author\u00a0shares some more practical examples of how large companies use big data to improve business practices. For instance, UPS could save $50 million a year by mapping routes that are just one mile shorter for each of their 55,000 routes traveled per day. Banks can track and monitor customer purchasing behavior in order to better detect fraudulent activity, and entertainment providers, like Netflix, can make predictions about which movies or shows a user\u00a0might enjoy based on their current viewing preferences.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-129 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.18.57-PM-1024x515.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"676\" height=\"340\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.18.57-PM-1024x515.png 1024w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.18.57-PM-300x151.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.18.57-PM-768x387.png 768w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.18.57-PM-600x302.png 600w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.18.57-PM-945x476.png 945w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.18.57-PM.png 1494w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>From improving business practices to enhancing the customer experience, big data has many applications for companies around the world. With this kind of success, it should come as no surprise that institutions of higher education are following suit (Watson, Wilson, Drew, &amp; Thompson, 2017). Given the challenges that universities face with declining overall enrollments and financial difficulties (Wiley Education Services, n.d.), more and more universities are paying attention to big data and learning analytics. Learning analytics holds promise to help institutions find ways to increase student retention and improve student outcomes for a brighter future (Dietz-Uhler &amp; Hurn, 2013).<\/p>\n<h1>Big Data and Learning Analytics in Education<\/h1>\n<div id=\"element_body_1134904\" class=\"element_body lv_331\">\n<blockquote>\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">The idea is simple yet potentially transformative: analytics provides a new model for college and university leaders to improve teaching, learning, organizational efficiency, and decision making and, as a consequence, serve as a foundation for systemic change (Long &amp; Siemens, 2011)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Bart Collins, Clinical Professor at Purdue University, (n.d.) describes some of the more specific benefits that can be realized for institutions of higher education. At the student level, access to analytics helps provide more information about academic performance. Using the analogy of a Fitbit or Apple watch, Collins explains how data can allow the user to notice patterns in behavior and make changes based on the feedback, and &#8220;compare progress towards learning goals&#8221; (Collins, n.d. para. 3). At the instructor level, educators can monitor student behaviors to better understand how course materials\u00a0are being utilized. Furthermore, instructors may even be able to understand how utilization of course materials relates to learning outcomes (as measured by grades). When patterns emerge, instructors can make changes to the course structure or materials in order to best meet student needs. Lastly, analytics can provide administrators with information about program performance and enrollments. For example, learning analytics may be able to provide answers to questions like, &#8220;which courses are students finding the most engaging?&#8221; or &#8220;are there student characteristics or engagement patterns that are associated with program retention?&#8221; (Collins, n.d., para. 8).<\/p>\n<p>The table that follows depicts some broader examples of how learning analytics are\u00a0being operationalized in higher education:<\/p>\n<div id=\"asset_263342\" class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\">\n<div id=\"asset_263342\" class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-130 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.23.03-PM-1024x630.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"676\" height=\"416\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.23.03-PM-1024x630.png 1024w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.23.03-PM-300x185.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.23.03-PM-768x473.png 768w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.23.03-PM-600x369.png 600w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.23.03-PM-945x582.png 945w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.23.03-PM.png 1472w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><\/div>\n<div>(Dietz-Uhler &amp; Hurn, 2013, p.19)<\/div>\n<div class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\">\n<h3><b>Applications in Online Learning<\/b><\/h3>\n<p>The evolution of online learning coupled with the rise of big data has provided new opportunities for applications in online learning (Watson, Wilson, Drew, &amp; Thompson, 2017). Just as users leave a digital footprint behind in the digital transactions they make every day (Marr, 2017), students enrolled in online learning leave a footprint in the online learning environment. In the realm of online learning, big data can be defined as &#8220;the data that is created by learners while they are taking an eLearning course or training module&#8221; (Pappas, 2014, para. 2). For example, when a student engages with a learning module in an online course, elements of the interaction are tracked and recorded (Dringus, 2012). This might include contributions or replies in a discussion forum, test scores, or media views. The parameters surrounding what information is recorded and where it is housed are established by the learning environment (or web tool utilized), such as the learning management system, social media platform, or other educational technology tools (Pappas, 2014). This information can be collected over time for a large number of students, and data mining algorithms can detect patterns to inform teaching and learning models (Bienkowski, Feng, &amp; Means, 2012).<\/p>\n<p>The ability to make discoveries from aggregated data is the hallmark of educational data mining, or EDM (Avella, Kebritchi, Nunn, Kanai, 2016). &#8220;EDM develops methods and applies techniques from statistics, machine learning, and data mining to analyze data collected during teaching and learning&#8221; (Bienkowski, Feng, &amp; Means, 2012, p. 9).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><iframe title=\"Learning analytics in a nutshell\" width=\"676\" height=\"380\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/XscUZ8dIa-8?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>(SOLAR, 2019)<\/p>\n<p>Learning analytics (LA) is another term used in the literature to describe what is done with the data collected from learning platforms. The Society for Learning Analytics Research defines learning analytics as &#8220;the measurement, collection, analysis, and reporting of data about learners and their contexts, for purposes of understanding and optimizing learning and the environments in which it occurs&#8221; (&#8220;about&#8221;, para. 1). The video shown above provides a brief introduction to the concept of LA. Some literature also references the notion of academic analytics, which is intended to describe the data that is generated within the institution, but outside of the learning space (Prinsloo, Archer, Barnes, Chetty, van Zyl, 2015). The diagram shown below provides an example of the relationship between big data, learning analytics, and academic analytics in the context of higher education.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_131\" style=\"width: 686px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-131\" class=\"wp-image-131 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.26.37-PM-1024x641.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"676\" height=\"423\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.26.37-PM-1024x641.png 1024w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.26.37-PM-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.26.37-PM-768x481.png 768w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.26.37-PM-600x376.png 600w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.26.37-PM-945x592.png 945w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.26.37-PM.png 1476w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-131\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Prinsloo, Archer, Barnes, Chetty, van Zyl, 2015, p. 289)<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1113117\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_1113119\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_1134904\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1134904\" class=\"element_body lv_331\">\n<p>While educational data mining and learning analytics are also closely related ideas, there are subtle differences. According to Bienkowski et. al (2012), EDM evaluates learning theories and guides teaching and learning practices, while LA generates applications that directly influence teaching and learning. Baker and Inventado (2014) reiterate that there are similarities and overlap between the concepts of EDM and LA, and add that the differences are mostly the result of the interests, or areas of focus, of specific researchers as opposed to a true philosophical difference.<\/p>\n<p>Dietz-Uhler &amp; Hurn (2013) suggest that &#8220;learning analytics can help faculty identify at-risk learners and provide interventions, transform pedagogical approaches, and help students gain insight into their own learning.&#8221; (p. 23).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1134905\" class=\"element section\">\n<h2>Assessment in Online Learning<\/h2>\n<div id=\"element_body_1134905\" class=\"element_body lv_606\">\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">There has been\u00a0a strong focus on assessment and assessment practices in higher education in the last two decades (Reeves, 2000). Reeves (2000) posits that the increased focus may be related to issues\u00a0of\u00a0grade inflation, academic integrity, and &#8220;calls for greater accountability with respect to educational outcomes&#8221; in higher education (Reeves, 2000, p. 101).<\/p>\n<p>Assessment of student learning outcomes is a critical aspect of intelligent course design, regardless of the mode of delivery. Best practices for learning assessment in the traditional classroom also apply to online learning (Muller, Gradel, Deane, Forte, McCabe, Pickett, Piorkowski, Scalzo, &amp; Sullivan, 2019). In a 2019\u00a0article identifying\u00a0the key competencies of award-winning online faculty,\u00a0seven competencies\u00a0were identified related to the assessment of student learning in the online modality:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Design assessment for courses<\/li>\n<li>Provide timely, meaningful, and consistent feedback<\/li>\n<li>Evaluate and revise assessments in courses<\/li>\n<li>Provide individual and group feedback<\/li>\n<li>Use student data to guide the feedback process<\/li>\n<li>Provide information to students about their progress<\/li>\n<li>Provide feedback in written, audio, and video forms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_body_1113119\" class=\"element_body lv_165\">\n<p>(Martin, Budhrani, Kumar, &amp; Ritzhaupt, 2019, p. 198)<\/p>\n<p>Muller et al. (2019) reports that both students and faculty agree that online learning should include a range of assessments, such as projects, peer evaluations, and timed tests. Using a wide range of assessments is especially important in higher education, where the focus not only includes specific knowledge and skills but also includes developing habits of mind, like problem-solving or ethical reasoning (Reeves, 2000). In order to maximize student learning, timeliness and quality of the feedback are critical for each of these assignments.<\/p>\n<p>While traditional assessments, like quizzes or tests, have their drawbacks, these methods may be used in online learning for reasons related to ease and objectivity of grading (Dikli, 2003). Traditional assessments are thought to primarily assess lower-order thinking skills, like recall\u00a0(Quansah, 2018); however,\u00a0this may still serve a valuable purpose in the learning process for students.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the ease of grading that comes with multiple-choice tests, some argue that authentic\u00a0assessments, like case studies or collaborative projects, may be a superior\u00a0means\u00a0for assessing learner mastery. Authentic assessments often require higher-order thinking skills, like synthesis or creation. This type of engagement may help students to succeed in online courses (Hulleman, Schrager, Bodmann, &amp; Harackiewicz, 2010). Reeves (2000) asserts\u00a0that &#8220;online learning environments provide enormous potential for enhancing the quality of academic assessment regardless of whether students are on-campus or at a distance, but that such improvements will require new approaches to assessment&#8230;&#8221; (p. 102).<\/p>\n<p>In an online course that uses best practice in learning design, learning is often student-centered. Students are actively constructing their own ideas and testing their ideas in the context of the online classroom. Additionally, students may also be able to exercise choice related to lesson content as well as how they are assessed\u00a0(Muller et al, 2019). With the evolution of online learning and the capabilities of many points of data through the\u00a0learning management systems, learning analytics may allow for new means for assessment.<\/p>\n<h2>Case Study: Applications of LA in Online Learning<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/d1311w59cs7lwz.cloudfront.net\/attachment\/266053\/07a22007707c85d054c3dbc61852ba4ae03fec7a\/Learning_20Analytics_20for_20Assessment.pdf?Expires=1595963519&amp;Signature=QlIpbsl9kKEvMaoKykPU39EuZdkzhwnVihuENvepfGo7I~8Si6Vmm4Lcbnhs6cgLYM7n0vANGWbyMWIBNsQjKg5iYfertSmSYzoUixuXzU1I9EqFx1Q16uXvrpsOcb6E-X3K18V73Kr4STxuQi7oGKDOEAXrk5ibLnxlncKTeRSYuztLw-CcGZ3-rQlo-nEw0Q4P-GOwGgr7nYZu7fMbFkaC8YSV32fFkg-ahG8cKB6JJn4xUt6XR~200arLkOVPUtyeS9rFHbvG19m9r6wAvQ1ma~KsLSdck9eh1jUsF2jzU8GMppxLHy61i9ihrXIYBWBoB~--l5M1~cm5mOGqkw__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAJELYXGUCCDL7FUQA\">Using Learning Analytics<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">As we look for ways to leverage learning analytics in assessment practices in online learning, it is pragmatic to define what, exactly, is being assessed. Do assessments provide measures\u00a0<em>of<\/em>\u00a0student learning or <i>for student<\/i>\u00a0learning (Martin &amp; Ndoye, 2016)? Williams (2017) explains that alternative assessment provides formative feedback that is used\u00a0<em>for<\/em>\u00a0learning as opposed to summative feedback\u00a0<em>of<\/em>\u00a0learning. Is it possible that alternative (learner-centered)\u00a0assessments\u00a0can serve both purposes? In the following case study, Martin and Ndoye (2016) provide practical examples of how learning analytics can be leveraged in online, learner-centered assessment, and the impact it has on teaching, learning, and potential course design.<\/p>\n<p>Online courses most often employ four types of assessment: 1) comprehension-type assessments, i.e. quizzes or tests, 2) discussion boards, 3) reflection-focused assessments, i.e. essays or research papers, and 4) project-based assessments, i.e. presentations or products. Table 1 on page 5 in the study linked above provides examples of LA techniques, along with the type of data that can be obtained from each form of assessment. It is important to note that many of the assessments seen in the table can produce quantitative or qualitative measures depending upon how they are set up in the analytics program being used.<\/p>\n<p>Course assignments in this case study included a mix of quizzes and projects and were administered over the course of 15-weeks. For the purpose of this study, the authors used two tools to measure the quantitative and the qualitative data generated by course assignments: ManyEyes for qualitative data (introductory video seen below) and Tableau for quantitative data. Both ManyEyes and Tableau are visual analysis tools that allow the user to make new connections from given a set of data.<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"Many Eyes\" width=\"676\" height=\"380\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/PH_-ZeB4_GE?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>(IBM, 2011)<\/p>\n<p>The data collected from\u00a0comprehension assessments\u00a0in this study\u00a0(quizzes)\u00a0included time spent on the quiz, quiz score and the number of times the quiz was accessed. These data points were tracked and plotted visually. Visual depictions of\u00a0data provide\u00a0instructors with a better\u00a0understanding of student behaviors for the purpose of providing individualized feedback for improvement. For example, the authors observed relationships between quiz scores, the number of times accessed, and total time spent on the quiz during each visit. As a result, this information could be used to differentiate instruction for students by providing more targeted feedback for improvement.<\/p>\n<p>In the project-based learning assessment, data points included time spent in the learning module and project score based on a grading rubric. The authors used a bullet graph to depict &#8216;frequency of access&#8217; to the project. In the image seen below, the larger circles depict students who accessed the project more frequently, while the smaller circles depict students who accessed the project less frequently. By comparing &#8216;frequency of access&#8217; with &#8216;assignment grade&#8217;,\u00a0instructors may discover\u00a0emerging patterns;\u00a0allowing instructors\u00a0to better understand the relationship between effort and learning. Does the amount of time spent on a project correlate to a student&#8217;s final grade on that assignment? Furthermore, this information could be useful for\u00a0evaluating class participation.<\/p>\n<div id=\"asset_265765\" class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-132 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.36.07-PM-1024x731.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"676\" height=\"483\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.36.07-PM-1024x731.png 1024w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.36.07-PM-300x214.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.36.07-PM-768x548.png 768w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.36.07-PM-600x428.png 600w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.36.07-PM-945x675.png 945w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.36.07-PM.png 1378w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><\/div>\n<p>For reflection focused assessments, researchers entered learners&#8217; written reflections into the program, ManyEyes.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-133 size-large\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.37.11-PM-1024x689.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"676\" height=\"455\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.37.11-PM-1024x689.png 1024w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.37.11-PM-300x202.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.37.11-PM-768x516.png 768w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.37.11-PM-600x403.png 600w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.37.11-PM-945x635.png 945w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-28-at-1.37.11-PM.png 1392w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In this case, instructors could identify keywords or phrases used most frequently in students&#8217; writing. Instructors may find this useful\u00a0if there are specific words, phrases, or concepts that should be part of a student&#8217;s writing. It is also possible to identify broader themes, or topics, in students&#8217; writing, however, additional software may be needed.<\/p>\n<p>When it comes to discussion forums, the same technique could also be applied.\u00a0Here again, the program\u00a0looks for patterns in words or phrases in an effort to pick up on common themes. For example, the authors\u00a0describe how this technique was used for an introductory discussion post where students were asked to share some information about themselves, as well as what they hoped to learn in the course. By entering this information into ManyEyes, the instructor could\u00a0see words that were most frequently utilized. In this study, the authors noticed that &#8216;family&#8217; or words closely related to &#8216;family&#8217;, i.e. &#8216;sister&#8217;, &#8216;brother&#8217; were most common. The identification of certain keywords may provide some context related to students&#8217;\u00a0backgrounds that may also play a role in student learning online.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, this case study serves as an example of how instructors can use the data available in online courses to positively influence student learning in real-time.\u00a0Moreover, data analysis may be useful for instructors to better understand student behavior, provide more individualized feedback and instruction, and to &#8220;benchmark students scores and practices&#8221; to better understand overall course performance (p.8). The information gleaned from the data can be\u00a0used to modify teaching and learning strategies, but may also be used to predict and identify students who may be at risk and in need of\u00a0intervention.<\/p>\n<div id=\"element_1134907\" class=\"element section\">\n<h2>Limitations and Concerns<\/h2>\n<div id=\"element_body_1134907\" class=\"element_body lv_410\">\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">While there are many reported benefits of the use of learning analytics to predict or measure student learning online, there are also limitations. Dringus (2012) explains\u00a0that learning management systems produce vast amounts of data that are not always easily accessible or easy to interpret. &#8220;The lack of transparency and undefined data in the online course may result in poor decision-making about student progress and performance&#8221; (Dringus, 2012, p. 88). Furthermore, Dringus (2012) emphasizes the importance of &#8220;getting the right data and getting the data right&#8221; (p. 98). Failure to do so (especially within the research) may lead to faulty conclusions by decision-makers and stakeholder groups, such as universities or accrediting agencies.<\/p>\n<p>Campbell, DeBlois, and Oblinger (2007) describe some of the common issues and concerns of faculty and administrators in higher education related to the adoption of learning analytics. First and foremost are the issues of privacy and sharing. Students and faculty may feel uneasy about their actions or behaviors being tracked and monitored online. Questions also remain as to who has access to the data, where is it stored, and how is it shared. Moreover, are colleges and universities morally responsible for using the data collected to increase student success (Campbell et al., 2007, Dietz-Uhler &amp; Hurn, 2013)?<\/p>\n<p>Another concern is the issue of &#8216;profiling&#8217;. Campbell et al. (2007) explain that learning analytics is often used to identify high performing students as well as those who are underperforming. The established profiles may be used to &#8220;prompt interventions or to predict student success&#8221; (p.54). Dietz-Uhler and Hurn (2013) acknowledge that faculty already have expectations for their students, but the learning analytics may lead to a new &#8220;set of data-driven expectations&#8221; (p. 24). Furthermore, the data does not take into account any of the social factors that may\u00a0influence student performance, i.e. health status, home life, etc. (Campbell et al., 2007).<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the question remains as to what is truly being measured? Can data points like the number of log-ins, time spent on a quiz, or other such data truly measure\u00a0student learning (Watters, 2012 as cited by Dietz-Uhler &amp; Hurn, 2013, p. 24)?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1134908\" class=\"element section\">\n<h2>Opportunities for the Future<\/h2>\n<div id=\"element_body_1134908\" class=\"element_body lv_498\">\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">Ferguson, Brasher, Clow, Griffiths, and Drachsler (2016) outline a vision for the future of education and the ways in which learning analytics may be leveraged to enhance student learning. By 2025, the authors envision that all learning tools will be equipped with sensors, and classrooms will have cameras with facial recognition software to track and monitor students as they learn. Wearables that track data, such as the Apple Watch or Fitbit, will be able to track more sophisticated physical information that can be used to\u00a0support learning, i.e. posture, stress, glucose levels. Learning analytics will be a more widely accepted practice, and data will be stored in an open system that negates the issues of data ownership or stewardship. By 2025, large datasets will have been established, allowing for more reliable predictions of learner outcomes. Students will have become accustomed to working with learning management systems that are guided by learning analytics, and this ultimately\u00a0leads to a dramatic shift in the role of educators.<\/p>\n<p>Ferguson et al. (2016) further assert that government and institutional policies will likely dictate the future of learning analytics in education. How learning analytics are utilized will &#8220;be greatly shaped by the regulatory framework which is established, the investment decisions made, the infrastructure and specifications which are promoted, and the educational discourse&#8221; (p. 1).<\/p>\n<p>As we look to the future, learning analytics holds promise for constituency groups\u00a0across campus. Avella, Kebritchi, Nunn, and\u00a0Kanai (2016) conclude that<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Data analysis provides educational stakeholders a comprehensive overview of the performance of the institution, curriculum, instructors, students, and post-educational employment outlooks. It also provides scholars and researchers with needed information to identify gaps between education and industry so that educators and institutions can overcome these deficiencies in course offerings. More important, the ability of big data to provide these revelations can help the field of education make significant progress to improve learning processes (p. 21).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"work\">\n<div class=\"back_matter\">\n<div id=\"element_1113120\" class=\"element references\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1113120\" class=\"element_body lv_302\">\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">Avella, J.T., Kebritchi, M., Nunn, S.G., &amp; Kanai, T. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review.\u00a0<em>Online Learning, 20<\/em>(2).\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelearningconsortium.org\/jaln_full_issue\/online-learning-special-issue-learning-analytics\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/onlinelearningconsortium.org\/jaln_full_issue\/online-learning-special-issue-learning-analytics\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Balkhi, S. (2019, January 19).\u00a0<em>How companies are using big data to boost sales, and how you can do the same.\u00a0<\/em>Entrepreneur.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/article\/325923\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/article\/325923<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Babson Survey Research Group. (2016).\u00a0<em>Online Report Card. Tracking Online Education in the United States<\/em>\u00a0[infographic].\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/2015SurveyInfo.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">http:\/\/www.onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/2015SurveyInfo.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Bean, R. (2017, March 28).\u00a0<em>How companies say they&#8217;re using big data<\/em>. Harvard Business Review.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/hbr.org\/2017\/04\/how-companies-say-theyre-using-big-data\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/hbr.org\/2017\/04\/how-companies-say-theyre-using-big-data<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., &amp; Means, B. (2012).\u00a0<em>Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief<\/em>. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. Washington, D.C.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/tech.ed.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/edm-la-brief.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">http:\/\/www.ed.gov\/technology<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Campbell, J.P., DeBlois, P.B., &amp; Oblinger, D.G. (2007). Academic analytics. A new tool for a new era,\u00a0<em>EDUCAUSE Review 42(<\/em>4) 40-57.<\/p>\n<p>Collins, B. (n.d.).\u00a0<em>Harnessing the Potential of Learning Analytics Across the University.\u00a0<\/em>Wiley Education Services.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/edservices.wiley.com\/potential-for-higher-education-learning-analytics\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/edservices.wiley.com\/potential-for-higher-education-learning-analytics\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Dickli, S. (2003). Assessment at a distance: Traditional vs. Alternative assessments.\u00a0<em>The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2<\/em>(3), 13-19.<\/p>\n<p>Dietz-Uhler &amp; Janet E. Hurn (2013).\u00a0Using learning analytics to predict (and improve) student success: A Faculty perspective.<em>\u00a0Journal of Interactive Online Learning,12<\/em>(1), 17-26<em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Dringus, L. P. (2012). Learning Analytics Considered Harmful.\u00a0<em>Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16<\/em>(3), 87\u2013100.<\/p>\n<p>Ferguson, R., Brasher, A., Clow, D., Griffiths, D., &amp; Drachsler, H. (2016, April 28). Learning Analytics: Visions of the Future. 6th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland. http:\/\/oro.open.ac.uk\/45312\/<\/p>\n<p>Ginder, S.A., Kelly-Reid, J.E., and Mann, F.B. (2018).\u00a0<em>Enrollment and Employees in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2017; and Financial Statistics and Academic Libraries, Fiscal Year 2017: First Look<\/em><em>(Provisional Data)<\/em>. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/nces.ed.gov\/pubs2019\/2019021REV.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">http:\/\/nces.ed.gov\/pubsearch<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Hulleman, C., Schrager, S., Bodmann, S., &amp; Harackiewicz, J. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?\u00a0<em>Psychological Bulletin, 136<\/em>(3), 422.\u00a0DOI: 10.1037\/a0018947<\/p>\n<p>IBM. (2011, April 5).\u00a0<em>Many Eyes<\/em>. [Video]. YouTube.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PH_-ZeB4_GE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PH_-ZeB4_GE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Lederman, D. (2019).\u00a0<em>Online Enrollments Grow, but Pace Slows.\u00a0<\/em>Inside Higher Education.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/digital-learning\/article\/2019\/12\/11\/more-students-study-online-rate-growth-slowed-2018\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/digital-learning\/article\/2019\/12\/11\/more-students-study-online-rate-growth-slowed-2018<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Long, P., &amp; Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 30\u201340.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/er.educause.edu\/articles\/2011\/9\/penetrating-the-fog-analytics-in-learning-and-education\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/er.educause.edu\/articles\/2011\/9\/penetrating-the-fog-analytics-in-learning-and-education<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Marr, B. (2017, March 14).\u00a0<em>The complete beginner&#8217;s guide to big data everyone can understand.\u00a0<\/em>Forbes.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/bernardmarr\/2017\/03\/14\/the-complete-beginners-guide-to-big-data-in-2017\/#298012a97365\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/bernardmarr\/2017\/03\/14\/the-complete-beginners-guide-to-big-data-in-2017\/#298012a97365<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S. &amp; Ritzhaupt, A. (2019).\u00a0Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies.\u00a0<em>Online Learning, 23<\/em>(1),<em>\u00a0<\/em>184-205.<\/p>\n<p>Muller, K., Gradel, K., Forte, M., McCabe, R., Pickett, A. M., Piorkowski, R., Scalzo, K., &amp; Sullivan, R. (n.d.). Assessing Student Learning in the Online Modality. 32.<\/p>\n<p>Pappas, C. (2014, July 24).\u00a0<em>Big data in eLearning: The future of eLearning industry.\u00a0<\/em>eLearning Industry.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/elearningindustry.com\/big-data-in-elearning-future-of-elearning-industry\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/elearningindustry.com\/big-data-in-elearning-future-of-elearning-industry<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Prinsloo, P. Archer, E., Barnes, G., Chetty, Y., van Zyl, D. (2015). Big(ger) data as better data in open distance learning.\u00a0<em>International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16<\/em>(1), 284-306.<\/p>\n<p>Raymond A. Mason School of Business at the College of William and Mary (n.d.).\u00a0<em>How companies use big data.\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/online.mason.wm.edu\/blog\/how-companies-use-big-data\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/online.mason.wm.edu\/blog\/how-companies-use-big-data<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative Assessment Approaches for Online Learning Environments in Higher Education.\u00a0<em>Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23<\/em>(1), 101\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2190\/GYMQ-78FA-WMTX-J06C<\/p>\n<p>U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, IPEDS, Spring 2019, Fall Enrollment component (provisional data).<\/p>\n<p>Watson, C., Wilson, A., Drew, V., &amp; Thompson, T.L. (2017). Small data, online learning and assessment practices in higher education: a case study of failure?\u00a0<em>Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education,<\/em>\u00a0<em>42<\/em>(7), 1030-1045.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2016.1223834\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2016.1223834<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Williams, P. (2017). Assessing Collaborative Learning: Big Data, Analytics and University Futures.\u00a0<em>Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education, 42<\/em>(6), 978\u2013989.<\/p>\n<p>Yupangco, J. (2017, September 4).\u00a0<em>The reason you need big data to improve online learning<\/em>. eLearning Industry.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/elearningindustry.com\/big-data-to-improve-online-learning-reason-need\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/elearningindustry.com\/big-data-to-improve-online-learning-reason-need<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Higher education is facing a number of challenges in the twenty-first century. Some of the top challenges include declining student enrollments, financial difficulties, and decreased state funding, to name a few (Wiley Education Services, n.d.). In a 2016 survey by&#8230; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/2020\/07\/28\/big-data-learning-analytics-and-the-role-of-assessment-in-online-learning\/\">Continue Reading &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3228,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,17,9],"tags":[21,20,14,4,11,7,19,3,10],"class_list":["post-126","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assessment","category-learning-analytics","category-online-learning","tag-assessment","tag-big-data","tag-college","tag-distance-education","tag-distance-learning","tag-higher-education","tag-learning-analytics","tag-online-learning","tag-virtual-learning"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3228"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":115,"date":"2020-07-17T13:40:26","date_gmt":"2020-07-17T17:40:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/?p=115"},"modified":"2020-07-17T15:32:43","modified_gmt":"2020-07-17T19:32:43","slug":"online-collaborative-learning-in-higher-education-a-review-of-the-literature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/2020\/07\/17\/online-collaborative-learning-in-higher-education-a-review-of-the-literature\/","title":{"rendered":"A Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes: Online Education vs. Traditional Classroom Instruction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"first_paragraph\">Despite the prevalence of online learning today, it is often viewed as a less favorable option when compared to the traditional, in-person educational experience. Criticisms of online learning come from various sectors, like employer groups, college faculty, and the general public, and generally includes a lack of perceived quality as well as rigor. Additionally, some students report feelings of social isolation in online learning (Protopsaltis &amp; Baum, 2019).<\/p>\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">In my experience as an online student as well as an online educator, online learning has been just the opposite. I have been teaching in a fully online master&#8217;s degree program for the last three years and have found it to be a rich and rewarding experience for students and faculty alike. As an instructor, I have felt more connected to and engaged with my online students when compared to in-person students. I have also found that students are actively engaged with course content and demonstrate evidence of higher-order thinking through their work. Students report high levels of satisfaction with their experiences in online learning as well as the program overall as indicated in their <a href=\"https:\/\/www.american.edu\/provost\/oira\/set.cfm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Student Evaluations of Teaching<\/a>\u00a0(SET) at the end of every course. I believe\u00a0that intelligent course design, in addition to my engagement in professional development related to teaching and learning online, has greatly influenced my experience.<\/p>\n<p>In an article by Wiley Education Services, authors identified the top six challenges facing US institutions of higher education, and include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Declining student enrollment<\/li>\n<li>Financial difficulties<\/li>\n<li>Fewer high school graduates<\/li>\n<li>Decreased state funding<\/li>\n<li>Lower world rankings<\/li>\n<li>Declining international student enrollments<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Of the strategies that institutions are exploring to remedy these issues, online learning is reported to be a key focus for many universities\u00a0(&#8220;Top Challenges Facing US Higher Education&#8221;, n.d.).<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_116\" style=\"width: 899px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-116\" class=\"wp-image-116 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.08.10-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"889\" height=\"438\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.08.10-PM.png 889w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.08.10-PM-300x148.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.08.10-PM-768x378.png 768w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.08.10-PM-600x296.png 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 889px) 100vw, 889px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-116\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Babson Survey Research Group, 2016, [PDF file].<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"asset_261380\" class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\">Considering the critical role that online education is anticipated to play in the future of higher education, I would like to explore how academia can make online learning a rich and rewarding experience for students and faculty alike, ultimately improving perceptions of online programs in the eyes of its critics.<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1113099\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1113099\" class=\"element_body lv_162\">\n<p>Some of the questions I would like to explore in further research include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What factors influence engagement and connection in distance education?<\/li>\n<li>Are the learning outcomes in online education any different than the outcomes achieved in a traditional classroom setting?<\/li>\n<li>How do course design and instructor training influence these factors?<\/li>\n<li>In what ways might educational technology tools enhance the overall experience for students and instructors alike?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In this literature review, I have chosen to focus on a comparison of student learning outcomes in online education versus the traditional classroom setting. My hope is that this research will unlock the answers to some of the additional questions posed above and provide additional direction for future research.<\/p>\n<h2>Online Learning Defined<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1115668\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1115668\" class=\"element_body lv_184\">\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">According to Mayadas, Miller, and Sener (2015), online courses are defined by all\u00a0course activity taking place online with no required\u00a0in-person sessions or on-campus activity. It is important to note, however, that\u00a0the Babson Survey Research Group, a prominent\u00a0organization known for their surveys and research in online learning,\u00a0defines online learning as a course in which 80-100% occurs online. While this distinction was made in an effort to provide consistency in surveys year over year, most institutions continue to define online learning as learning that occurs 100% online.<\/p>\n<p>Blended or hybrid learning is defined by courses that mix face to face meetings, sessions, or activities with online work. The ratio of online to classroom activity is often determined by the label in which the course is given. For example, a blended classroom course would likely include more time spent in the classroom, with the remaining work occurring outside of the classroom with the assistance of technology. On the other hand, a\u00a0blended online course would contain a greater percentage of work done online, with some required in-person sessions or meetings\u00a0(Mayadas, Miller, &amp; Sener, 2015).<\/p>\n<p>A classroom course (also referred to as a traditional course) refers to course activity that is anchored to a regular meeting time.<\/p>\n<h2>Enrollment Trends in Online Education<\/h2>\n<div id=\"element_body_1113100\" class=\"element_body lv_99\">\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">There has been an upward trend in the number of postsecondary students enrolled in online courses in the U.S. since 2002. A report by the Babson Survey Research Group showed that in 2016, more than six million students were enrolled in at least one online course. This number accounted for 31.6% of all college students (Seaman, Allen, &amp; Seaman, 2018). Approximately one in three students are enrolled in online courses with no in-person component. Of these students, 47% take classes in a fully online program. The remaining 53% take some, but not all courses online (Protopsaltis &amp; Baum, 2019).<\/p>\n<div id=\"asset_261364\" class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\">\n<div id=\"attachment_117\" style=\"width: 885px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-117\" class=\"wp-image-117 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.15.56-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"875\" height=\"516\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.15.56-PM.png 875w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.15.56-PM-300x177.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.15.56-PM-768x453.png 768w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.15.56-PM-600x354.png 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 875px) 100vw, 875px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-117\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Seaman et al., 2016, p. 11)<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1115668\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1115668\" class=\"element_body lv_184\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1113100\" class=\"element_body lv_99\">\n<h2>Perceptions of Online Education<\/h2>\n<div id=\"asset_261364\" class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\">Despite the prevalence of online learning today, it is often viewed as less favorable when compared to a more traditional, in-person educational experience. Criticisms of online learning come from sectors like employer groups, college faculty, and the general public, and include lack of perceived quality as well as rigor (Protopsaltis &amp; Baum, 2019).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_body_1113101\" class=\"element_body lv_356\">\n<p>In a 2016 report by the Babson Survey Research Group, surveys of faculty between 2002-2015 showed approval ratings regarding the value and legitimacy of online education ranged from 28-34 percent. While numbers have increased and decreased over the thirteen-year time frame, faculty approval was at 29 percent in 2015, just 1 percent higher than the approval ratings noted in 2002 &#8211; indicating that perceptions have remained relatively unchanged over the years (Allen, Seaman, Poulin, &amp; Straut, 2016).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_119\" style=\"width: 688px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-119\" class=\"wp-image-119 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.23.55-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"678\" height=\"270\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.23.55-PM.png 678w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.23.55-PM-300x119.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.23.55-PM-600x239.png 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 678px) 100vw, 678px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-119\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Allen, I.E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., Taylor Strout, T., 2016, p. 26)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In a separate survey of chief academic officers, perceptions of online learning appeared to align with that of faculty. In this survey, leaders were asked to rate their perceived quality of learning outcomes in online learning when compared to traditional in-person settings. While the percentage of leaders rating online learning as \u201cinferior\u201d or \u201csomewhat inferior\u201d to traditional face-to-face courses dropped from 43 percent\u00a0to 23 percent\u00a0between 2003 to 2012, the number rose again to 29 percent\u00a0in 2015\u00a0(Allen, Seaman, Poulin, &amp; Straut, 2016).<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-120 size-full aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.26.27-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"701\" height=\"426\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.26.27-PM.png 701w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.26.27-PM-300x182.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.26.27-PM-600x365.png 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 701px) 100vw, 701px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Faculty and academic leaders in higher education are not alone when it comes to perceptions of inferiority when compared to traditional classroom instruction. A 2013 Gallop poll assessing public perceptions showed that respondents rated online education as \u201cworse\u201d in five of the seven categories seen in the table below.<\/p>\n<div id=\"asset_260146\" class=\"figure cg_image embedded_asset\">\n<div id=\"attachment_121\" style=\"width: 649px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-121\" class=\"wp-image-121 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.28.18-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"639\" height=\"419\" srcset=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.28.18-PM.png 639w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.28.18-PM-300x197.png 300w, https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/07\/Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-1.28.18-PM-600x393.png 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-121\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Saad, L., Busteed, B., and Ogisi, M., 2013, October 15)<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>In general, Americans believed that online education provides both lower quality and less individualized instruction and less rigorous testing and grading when compared to the traditional classroom setting. In addition, respondents also thought that employers would perceive a degree from an online program less positively when compared to a degree obtained through traditional classroom instruction (Saad, Busteed, &amp; Ogisi, 2013).<\/p>\n<h3>Student Perceptions of Online Learning<\/h3>\n<p>So what do students have to say about online learning? In\u00a0<em>Online College Students 2015: Comprehensive Data on Demands and Preferences,\u00a0<\/em>1500 college students who were either enrolled or planning to enroll in a fully online undergraduate, graduate, or certificate program were surveyed. 78 percent of students believed the academic quality of their online learning experience to be better than or equal to their experiences with traditional classroom learning. Furthermore, 30 percent of online students polled said that they would likely not attend classes face to face if their program were not available online (Clienfelter &amp; Aslanian, 2015). The following video describes some of the common reasons why students choose to attend college online.<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"How online learning affects the lives of students\" width=\"676\" height=\"380\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/mPDMagf_oAE?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><em>How Online Learning Affects the Lives of Students (<\/em>Pearson North America, 2018, June 25)<\/p>\n<p>In a 2015 study comparing student perceptions of online learning with face to face learning, researchers found that the majority of students surveyed expressed a preference for traditional face to face classes. A content analysis of the findings, however, brought attention to two key ideas: 1) student opinions of online learning may be based on &#8220;old typology of distance education&#8221; (Tichavsky, et al, 2015, p.6) as opposed to actual experience, and 2) a student&#8217;s inclination to choose one form over another is connected to issues of teaching presence and self-regulated learning (Tichavsky et al, 2015).<\/p>\n<h2>Student Learning Outcomes<\/h2>\n<div id=\"element_1113116\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1113116\" class=\"element_body lv_570\">\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">Given the upward trend in student enrollment in online courses in postsecondary schools and the steady ratings of the low perceived value of online learning by stakeholder groups, it should be no surprise that there is a large body of literature comparing student learning outcomes in online classes to the traditional classroom environment.<\/p>\n<p>While a majority of the studies reviewed found no significant difference in learning outcomes when comparing online to\u00a0traditional courses\u00a0(Cavanaugh &amp; Jacquemin, 2015; Kemp &amp; Grieve, 2014; Lyke &amp; Frank 2012; Nichols, Shaffer, &amp; Shockey, 2003; Stack, 2015; Summers, Waigandt, &amp; Whittaker, 2005), there were a few outliers. In a 2019 report by Protopsaltis\u00a0&amp; Baum, authors confirmed that while learning is often found to be similar between the two mediums, students &#8220;with weak academic preparation and those from low-income and underrepresented backgrounds consistently underperform in fully-online environments&#8221; (Protopsaltis\u00a0&amp; Baum, 2019, n.p.). An important consideration, however, is that these findings are primarily based on students enrolled in online courses at the community college level &#8211; a demographic with a historically high\u00a0rate of attrition\u00a0compared to students attending\u00a0four-year institutions (Ashby, Sadera, &amp; McNary, 2011). Furthermore, students enrolled in online courses have been shown to have a 10 \u2013 20 percent\u00a0increase in attrition over their peers who are enrolled in traditional classroom instruction\u00a0(Angelino, Williams, &amp; Natvig, 2007). Therefore, attrition may be a key contributor to the lack of achievement seen in this subgroup of students enrolled in online education.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, there were a small number of\u00a0studies that showed\u00a0that\u00a0online students tend to outperform those enrolled in\u00a0traditional classroom instruction. One study, in particular, found a significant difference in test scores for\u00a0students enrolled in an online, undergraduate business course. The confounding variable, in this case, was age. Researchers found a significant difference in performance in nontraditional age students over their traditional age counterparts. Authors concluded that older students may elect to take\u00a0online classes for practical\u00a0reasons related to outside work schedules, and this may, in turn, contribute to the learning that occurs overall (Slover &amp; Mandernach, 2018).<\/p>\n<p>In a meta-analysis and review of online learning spanning the years 1996 to 2008, authors from the US Department of Education found that students who took all or part of their classes online showed better learning outcomes than those students who took the same courses face-to-face. In these cases, it is important to note that there were many differences noted in the online and face-to-face versions, including the amount of time students spent engaged with course content. The authors concluded that the differences in learning outcomes may be attributed to learning design as opposed to the specific mode of delivery (Means, Toyoma, Murphy, Bakia, Jones, 2009).<\/p>\n<h2>Limitations and Opportunities<\/h2>\n<p>After examining the research comparing student learning outcomes in online education with the traditional classroom setting, there are many limitations that came to light, creating areas of opportunity for additional research. In many of the studies referenced, it is difficult to determine the pedagogical practices used in course design and delivery. Research shows the importance of student-student and student-teacher interaction in online learning, and the positive impact of these variables on student learning (Bernard, Borokhovski, Schmid, Tamim, &amp; Abrami, 2014). Some researchers note that while many studies comparing online and traditional classroom learning exist, the methodologies and design issues make it challenging to explain the results conclusively (Mollenkopf, Vu, Crow, &amp; Black, 2017). For example, some online courses may be structured in a variety of ways, i.e. self-paced, instructor-led and may be classified as synchronous or asynchronous (Moore, Dickson-Deane, Galyan, 2011)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1113117\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_1113117\" class=\"element section\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1113117\" class=\"element_body lv_239\">\n<p>Another\u00a0gap in the literature is the failure to use a common language across studies to define the learning environment. This issue is explored extensively in a 2011 study by Moore, Dickson-Deane, and Galyan. Here, the authors\u00a0examine\u00a0the differences between e-learning, online learning, and distance learning in the literature, and\u00a0how the terminology is often used interchangeably despite the variances in characteristics that define each.\u00a0The authors also discuss the variability in the terms &#8220;course&#8221; versus &#8220;program&#8221;. This variability in the literature\u00a0presents a challenge when attempting\u00a0to compare one study of online learning to another\u00a0(Moore, Dickson-Deane, &amp; Galyan, 2011).<\/p>\n<p>Finally, much of the literature in higher education focuses on undergraduate-level classes within the United States. Little research is available on outcomes in graduate-level classes as well as general information on student learning outcomes and perceptions of online learning outside of the U.S.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"element_1113119\" class=\"element section\">\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<div id=\"element_body_1113119\" class=\"element_body lv_165\">\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">As we look to the future, there are additional questions to explore in the area of online learning. Overall, this research led to questions related to learning design when comparing the two modalities in higher education. Further research is needed to investigate the instructional strategies used to enhance student learning, especially in students with weaker academic preparation or from underrepresented backgrounds. Given the integral role that online learning is expected to play in the future of higher education in the United States, it may be even more critical to move beyond comparisons of online versus face to face. Instead, choosing to focus on sound pedagogical quality with consideration for the mode of delivery as a means for promoting positive learning outcomes.<\/p>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"work\">\n<div class=\"back_matter\">\n<div id=\"element_1113120\" class=\"element references\">\n<div id=\"element_body_1113120\" class=\"element_body lv_302\">\n<p class=\"first_paragraph\">Allen, I.E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., &amp; Straut, T. (2016). Online Report Card: Tracking Online Education in the United States [PDF file]. Babson Survey Research Group.\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/onlinereportcard.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">http:\/\/onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/onlinereportcard.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., &amp; Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates.\u00a0<em>The Journal of Educators Online<\/em>, 4(2).<\/p>\n<p>Ashby, J., Sadera, W.A., &amp; McNary, S.W. (2011). Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face.\u00a0<em>Journal of Interactive Online Learning<\/em>, 10(3), 128-140.<\/p>\n<p>Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R.F., Tamim, R.M., &amp; Abrami, P.C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied.\u00a0<em>Journal of Computing in Higher Education<\/em>, 26(1), 87-122.<\/p>\n<p>Cavanaugh, J.K. &amp; Jacquemin, S.J. (2015). A large sample comparison of grade based student learning outcomes in online vs. face-fo-face courses.\u00a0<em>Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network,\u00a0<\/em>19(2).<\/p>\n<p>Clinefelter, D. L., &amp; Aslanian, C. B. (2015). Online college students 2015: Comprehensive data on demands and preferences.\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.learninghouse.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/OnlineCollegeStudents2015.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.learninghouse.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/OnlineCollegeStudents2015.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Golubovskaya, E.A., Tikhonova, E.V., &amp; Mekeko, N.M. (2019). Measuring learning outcome and students\u2019 satisfaction in ELT (e-learning against conventional learning). Paper presented the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 34-38. Doi: 10.1145\/3337682.3337704<\/p>\n<p>Kemp, N. &amp; Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates&#8217; opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning.\u00a0<em>Frontiers in Psychology<\/em>, 5. Doi:\u00a010.3389\/fpsyg.2014.01278<\/p>\n<p>Lyke, J., &amp;\u00a0Frank, M. (2012). Comparison of student learning outcomes in online and traditional classroom environments in a psychology course. (Cover story).\u00a0<em>Journal of Instructional Psychology<\/em>, 39(3\/4), 245-250.<\/p>\n<p>Mayadas, F., Miller, G. &amp; Senner, J.\u00a0<em>Definitions of E-Learning Courses and Programs Version 2.0.\u00a0<\/em>Online Learning Consortium.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelearningconsortium.org\/updated-e-learning-definitions-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/onlinelearningconsortium.org\/updated-e-learning-definitions-2\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., &amp;\u00a0Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www2.ed.gov\/rschstat\/eval\/tech\/evidence-based-practices\/finalreport.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www2.ed.gov\/rschstat\/eval\/tech\/evidence-based-practices\/finalreport.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Mollenkopf, D., Vu, P., Crow, S, &amp; Black, C. (2017). Does online learning deliver? A comparison of student teacher outcomes from candidates in face to face and online program pathways.\u00a0<em>Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration.\u00a0<\/em>20(1).<\/p>\n<p>Moore, J.L., Dickson-Deane, C., &amp; Galyan, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?\u00a0<em>The Internet and Higher Education<\/em>.\u00a014(2), 129-135.<\/p>\n<p>Nichols, J., Shaffer, B., &amp;\u00a0Shockey, K. (2003). Changing the face of instruction: Is online or in-class more effective?\u202f\u00a0<em>College &amp; Research Libraries<\/em>,\u202f64(5), 378\u2013388.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/doi-org.proxy2.library.illinois.edu\/10.5860\/crl.64.5.378\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/doi-org.proxy2.library.illinois.edu\/10.5860\/crl.64.5.378<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Parsons-Pollard, N., Lacks, T.R., &amp; Grant, P.H. (2008). A comparative assessment of student learning outcomes in large online and traditional campus based introduction to criminal justice courses.\u00a0<em>Criminal Justice Studies<\/em>, 2, 225-239.<\/p>\n<p>Pearson North America. (2018, June 25).\u00a0<em>How Online Learning Affects the Lives of Students<\/em>. YouTube.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=mPDMagf_oAE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=mPDMagf_oAE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Protopsaltis, S., &amp;\u00a0Baum, S. (2019). Does online education live up to its promise? A look at the evidence and implications for federal policy [PDF file].\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/mason.gmu.edu\/~sprotops\/OnlineEd.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">http:\/\/mason.gmu.edu\/~sprotops\/OnlineEd.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Saad, L., Busteed, B., &amp; Ogisi, M. (October 15, 2013). In U.S., Online Education Rated Best for Value and Options.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/news.gallup.com\/poll\/165425\/online-education-rated-best-value-options.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/news.gallup.com\/poll\/165425\/online-education-rated-best-value-options.aspx<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Stack, S. (2015). Learning Outcomes in an Online vs Traditional Course.\u202f<em>International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning<\/em>,\u202f9(1).<\/p>\n<p>Seaman, J.E., Allen, I.E., &amp; Seaman, J. (2018). Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States [PDF file]. Babson Survey Research Group.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/gradeincrease.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">http:\/\/onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/gradeincrease.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Slover, E. &amp; Mandernach, J. (2018). Beyond Online versus Face-to-Face Comparisons: The Interaction of Student Age and Mode of Instruction on Academic Achievement.\u00a0<em>Journal of Educators Online,\u00a0<\/em>15(1)<em>.\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/files.eric.ed.gov\/fulltext\/EJ1168945.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/files.eric.ed.gov\/fulltext\/EJ1168945.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Summers, J., Waigandt, A., &amp; Whittaker, T. (2005). A Comparison of Student Achievement and Satisfaction in an Online Versus a Traditional Face-to-Face Statistics Class.\u202f<em>Innovative Higher Education<\/em>,\u202f29(3), 233\u2013250.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/doi-org.proxy2.library.illinois.edu\/10.1007\/s10755-005-1938-x\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/doi-org.proxy2.library.illinois.edu\/10.1007\/s10755-005-1938-x<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Tichavsky, L.P., Hunt, A., Driscoll, A., &amp; Jicha, K. (2015). &#8220;It&#8217;s just nice having a real teacher&#8221;: Student perceptions of online versus face-to-face instruction.\u00a0<em>International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.\u00a0<\/em>9(2).<\/p>\n<p>Wiley Education Services. (n.d.).\u00a0<em>Top challenges facing U.S. higher education.\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/edservices.wiley.com\/top-higher-education-challenges\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/edservices.wiley.com\/top-higher-education-challenges\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Despite the prevalence of online learning today, it is often viewed as a less favorable option when compared to the traditional, in-person educational experience. Criticisms of online learning come from various sectors, like employer groups, college faculty, and the general&#8230; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/2020\/07\/17\/online-collaborative-learning-in-higher-education-a-review-of-the-literature\/\">Continue Reading &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3228,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[14,4,11,13,7,3,16,12,15,10],"class_list":["post-115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-online-learning","tag-college","tag-distance-education","tag-distance-learning","tag-face-to-face","tag-higher-education","tag-online-learning","tag-postsecondary","tag-traditional-learning","tag-university","tag-virtual-learning"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3228"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":85,"date":"2020-05-07T18:59:30","date_gmt":"2020-05-07T22:59:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/?p=85"},"modified":"2020-07-10T10:11:43","modified_gmt":"2020-07-10T14:11:43","slug":"online-collaborative-learning-in-higher-education","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/2020\/05\/07\/online-collaborative-learning-in-higher-education\/","title":{"rendered":"Online Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As an instructor in a fully online program, I often use group work as a means to increase engagement and facilitate a connection in the online classroom. In some classes, I ask students to work in groups on individual assignments, but for the purpose of giving and receiving feedback on their respective projects. For example, in a course on Nutrition Education Methods, students work to develop individual lessons that they ultimately deliver at the end of the term. In this case, peer feedback is used to strengthen their work. In other classes, I ask students to work together in groups where they all contribute to a larger, shared project that they submit at the end of the term. In a course on Health Communication, for example, students work collaboratively to develop and implement a social marketing campaign that addresses a health-related issue of their choosing.<\/p>\n<p>In course evaluations, the group assignments established for giving and receiving peer feedback are generally well-received and students note their appreciation for their groups\u2019 remarks. In the second example, student evaluations about their experience are often mixed. Some report a positive group experience, while others are disappointed with the final outcome.<\/p>\n<p>The ability to work collaboratively with a team is a skill that serves students well beyond their college years. A\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/learning.linkedin.com\/blog\/top-skills\/the-skills-companies-need-most-in-2020and-how-to-learn-them\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/learning.linkedin.com\/blog\/top-skills\/the-skills-companies-need-most-in-2020and-how-to-learn-them\">recent article<\/a>\u00a0on LinkedIn Learning (Pace, 2020) outlines the \u201csoft\u201d skills that companies are seeking in prospective employees in 2020. These skills include creativity, persuasion, collaboration, adaptability, and emotional intelligence \u2013 all skills that \u201cdemonstrate how we work with others and bring new ideas to the table\u201d (Pace, 2020, para. 2). As an instructor, I see the larger benefits of collaborative learning, but recognize how these assignments translate in the online classroom\u00a0isn\u2019t always successful.<\/p>\n<p>In this review of the literature, my aim is to share the results of my research on collaborative learning and its applications in the online environment in higher education, as well as the circumstances that make collaborative learning a positive experience for students and teachers alike.<\/p>\n<h2>What is Collaborative Learning?<\/h2>\n<p>The word collaboration \u201csuggests a way of dealing with people which respects and highlights individual group members\u2019 abilities and contributions. There is a sharing of authority and acceptance of responsibility among group members for the groups\u2019 actions\u201d (Laal &amp; Ghodsi, 2012, p. 486). Collaborative learning requires that learners work together to make connections and uncover new ways of understanding concepts (Laal &amp; Laal, 2012 as cited by Falcione et al., 2019). Falcione et al. (2019) add to this definition by explaining that collaborative learning is a way for students to intertwine\u00a0their independent work in order to achieve a shared goal. The results of these efforts are a \u201cproduct or a learning experience that is more than the summation of individual contributions\u201d (Falcione et al., 2019, p. 1).<\/p>\n<p>The foundation of collaborative learning is the idea that learning with others is better than learning alone (Nokes-Malach et al., 2015). In fact, the primary goal of team-centered, collaborative environments is to apply the unique backgrounds and skills that individuals bring to a group and accomplish something together that they may otherwise be unable to accomplish individually (Roberts, 2004).<\/p>\n<p>Online learning naturally lends itself to student-centered instructional strategies and assessments, and collaborative learning most certainly fits this category (Muller et al., 2019). Given the physical distance that separates online students, collaborative learning efforts may also help students connect in an effort to dissolve any feelings of isolation they may be experiencing (Writers, 2018).<\/p>\n<p>Harasim (2012) as cited by Bates (2015), offers the following definition of Online Collaborative Learning (OCL):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Online collaborative learning theory provides a model of learning in which students are encouraged and supported to work together to create knowledge: to invent, to explore ways to innovate, and, by so doing, to seek the conceptual knowledge needed to solve problems rather than recite what they think is the right answer\u00a0(Harasim, 2012 as cited by Bates, 2015, para 1).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The image shown below depicts the core principles of Online Collaborative Learning\u00a0and how these principles are operationalized through online discussions. Discussion forums often serve as the backbone for learning in online environments. Bates (2015) argues that online discussion forums are not meant to supplement course content (typically delivered through lectures and textbooks),\u00a0but should be the central means for content delivery. Here, students identify readings and resources\u00a0<em>to support the discussion<\/em>\u00a0as opposed to allowing the readings and resources to be the driver. It is through this discourse that students are able to generate and organize ideas and ultimately achieve \u201cintellectual convergence\u201d by synthesizing the ideas presented (Bates, 2015). Because the discussion happens asynchronously, students have time to ruminate over the ideas presented and respond in a more thoughtful manner (Roberts, 2004).<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/04\/Screen-Shot-2020-04-28-at-2.03.49-PM-300x252.png\" alt=\"Harasim's pedagogy of group discussion\" width=\"300\" height=\"252\" \/><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Bates, 2015)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Another important element of the Online Collaborative Learning\u00a0model depicted above is the role of the teacher. Here, the teacher serves as a facilitator of the discussion in an effort to move students through the process of generating, organizing, and synthesizing ideas (Bates, 2015). The concept of &#8220;teacher&#8221; as\u00a0&#8220;facilitator&#8221; is a hallmark of student-centered, online learning.<\/p>\n<h2>Related Terms and Theories<\/h2>\n<p>Collaborative learning is sometimes used interchangeably with the term \u201ccooperative learning\u201d (Writers, 2018). Balkcom (1992) defines\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www2.ed.gov\/pubs\/OR\/ConsumerGuides\/cooplear.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www2.ed.gov\/pubs\/OR\/ConsumerGuides\/cooplear.html\">cooperative learning<\/a>\u00a0as an instructional strategy that uses groups made up of diverse learners. Groups\u00a0are engaged in\u00a0a variety of activities to enhance their understanding of lesson concepts, and members have a shared responsibility to help one another learn and grow.\u00a0A key component of cooperative learning is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/serc.carleton.edu\/introgeo\/cooperative\/whatis.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/serc.carleton.edu\/introgeo\/cooperative\/whatis.html\">positive interdependence<\/a>\u00a0(<em>What is Cooperative Learning<\/em>, n.d.). Positive interdependence is established when students perceive that the contribution of each group member is essential to the success of the group. Scager et al. (2016) found positive interdependence to be a critical factor in successful collaboration.<\/p>\n<p>While the two concepts share many of the same characteristics, Falcione et al. (2019), argues that cooperative learning is, in fact, different from collaborative learning. The primary factor that differentiates collaborative learning from cooperative learning is the independent work that group members do in order to contribute to the task at hand. This work is done at different times and is often developed alone. However, the individual&#8217;s work is later combined with the work of other group members\u00a0in order to synthesize ideas.<br \/>\nThe following video expands on this idea and identifies additional factors that differentiate collaborative learning from cooperative learning:<\/p>\n<p><iframe title=\"Cooperative vs Collaborative\" width=\"676\" height=\"380\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/uwvtfYa169k?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>(Wufei87, 2018)<\/p>\n<p>Another related concept evident in the literature is a Community of Inquiry (CoI). In the image below, Garrison, Anderson, and Archer (2000) depict the CoI framework that they argue is integral to the online learning experience in higher education.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/04\/Screen-Shot-2020-04-28-at-2.08.58-PM-300x282.png\" alt=\"Community of Inquiry Model\" width=\"300\" height=\"282\" \/><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Garrison, Anderson, &amp; Archer, 2000, p. 88)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Here, the educational experience is at the center of the CoI model, and learning takes place through the interaction of three vital components: social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence. Social presence represents the idea that individuals within the community are able to interject elements of their personality into the group so that they are seen as \u201creal people\u201d (Garrison, Anderson, &amp; Archer, 2000, p. 89). Cognitive presence is deemed the most important of the three and refers to the ability of learners to \u201cconstruct meaning through sustained communication\u201d (Garrison, Anderson, &amp; Archer, 2000, p. 89). The authors argue that cognitive presence is critical to developing higher-order thinking skills (which is necessary in postsecondary education). Finally, teaching presence is defined by two key functions: 1) course design and 2) facilitation. Essentially, the goal of teaching presence is to facilitate cognitive presence and social presence within the community (Garrison, Anderson, &amp; Archer, 2000). Bates (2015) concludes that CoI and OCL are more &#8220;complementary rather than competing&#8221; (section 4.4.3) ideas and are, therefore, not mutually exclusive models for learning.<\/p>\n<p>Online collaborative learning may be classified as a constructivist approach to learning (Bates, 2015).\u00a0Constructivism is a theory that posits that learners actively construct knowledge as opposed to passively receiving it. This knowledge is further developed through life experiences allowing learners to develop mental models as a way to make sense of new information (<em>Constructivism<\/em>, n.d.). The table below outlines the differences between traditional learning and constructivist learning:<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1613\/2020\/04\/Screen-Shot-2020-04-28-at-2.14.20-PM-300x159.png\" alt=\"Table with comparisons of traditional versus constructivist classrooms\" width=\"300\" height=\"159\" \/><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Constructivism, n.d.)<\/p><\/div>\n<h2>Examples of Collaborative Learning<\/h2>\n<p>In the traditional classroom setting, collaborative learning can take on many forms. Problem-based learning, jigsaw activities, think-pair-share, and peer review are just a few common examples\u00a0(Nokes-Malach et al., 2015). These strategies\u00a0are defined in more detail below:<\/p>\n<p><b>Problem-based learning:\u00a0<\/b>In this strategy, students work in groups to collaboratively solve a larger problem. The group work takes place over an extended period of time and often requires some deliverable at the end of the project (Active and Collaborative Learning | University of Maryland\u2014Teaching and Learning Transformation Center, n.d.).<\/p>\n<p><b>Jigsaw:\u00a0<\/b>This strategy takes a problem or task and divides it into smaller components. Each component is assigned to a group in order to gain a deeper understanding of the topic, who ultimately reports out in an effort to contribute their understanding as a piece of the larger puzzle (Active and Collaborative Learning | University of Maryland\u2014Teaching and Learning Transformation Center, n.d.).<\/p>\n<p><b>Think-pair-share:\u00a0<\/b>This strategy starts by dividing students into pairs. The instructor then provides students with a discussion prompt or question to consider. Individual learners reflect on the problem independently before sharing their thoughts or ideas with a peer. Once both students have had a chance to discuss, they may share a summary of their discussion with the rest of the group (Active and Collaborative Learning | University of Maryland\u2014Teaching and Learning Transformation Center, n.d.).<\/p>\n<p><b>Peer review:\u00a0<\/b>This strategy allows students to review one another\u2019s work and provide positive and constructive feedback to facilitate improvement. The strategy teaches students as writers to receive, evaluate, and choose whether or not to incorporate the feedback into their work. As editors, it teaches students to analyze and clearly communicate feedback with their peers. As an instructor, it is critical to provide guidance and structure to best facilitate the process (Active and Collaborative Learning | University of Maryland\u2014Teaching and Learning Transformation Center, n.d.).<\/p>\n<p>All of these strategies can be adapted for\u00a0the online learning environment, however, online collaboration tools, i.e.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/zoom.us\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/zoom.us\/\">Zoom<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/docs\/about\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/docs\/about\/\">Google Docs<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/voicethread.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/voicethread.com\/\">S<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/slack.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/slack.com\/\">lack<\/a>, or\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.padlet.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"http:\/\/www.padlet.com\">T<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/trello.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/trello.com\/\">rello<\/a>,\u00a0are often used to facilitate the transition (Writers, 2018). Tarun (2019) defines online collaboration tools as &#8220;web-based tools that allow individuals to do things together online like messaging, file sharing, and assessment&#8221; (p. 276). Integrating technology tools like these in the classroom fosters &#8220;authentic and meaningful learning experiences&#8221; (Boundless, 2015, sec 2) and also supports differentiated learning efforts (Boundless, 2015).<\/p>\n<p>A basic\u00a0search online for &#8220;online collaboration tools for education&#8221; yielded a variety of sites ranking the top-rated tools for digital collaboration (EDsmart, 2015; TeachThought,\u00a02019). In the 2019 article, the tools ranked covered broad categories like\u00a0tools for communication, project management, peer review, and game-based learning.\u00a0Listed below are some examples that the authors highlighted in this post:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.diigo.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.diigo.com\/\">Diigo<\/a>: Diigo is a social bookmarking tool that allows learners to collect, annotate, organize, and share online resources.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/info.flipgrid.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/info.flipgrid.com\/\">Flipgrid<\/a>: Flipgrid is a tool that allows learners to create and share short videos and can be used for reflections, discussions, or short presentations. Additionally,\u00a0peers can respond to posts in video form. The\u00a0&#8220;grade book&#8221; feature within the tool allows instructors to track and monitor participation.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ant.umn.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/ant.umn.edu\/\">VideoAnt<\/a>: VideoAnt is a tool that allows students and teachers to annotate YouTube videos. Here, students can ask questions or add critiques at various spots throughout the video.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/padlet.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/padlet.com\/\">Padlet<\/a>: Padlet is a multimodal group collaboration tool. Here, students can collect videos, articles, or images and post them to a virtual corkboard. Students can also comment on posts in a threaded discussion format.<\/p>\n<p>Appavoo, Sukon, Gokhool, and Gooria\u00a0(2019) add that tools\u00a0like WhatsApp, Skype, and Moodle are popular tools for online collaborative learning\u00a0in higher education. These tools offer learners a way to discuss and share ideas and gain instant feedback. Furthermore, some students report that they prefer to learn on tools like these as they feel more open to discussing any academic-related issues they may be experiencing (Preston, Phillips, Gosper, McNeil, Woo, and Green, 2010, as cited by Appavoo et al., 2019).<\/p>\n<h2>Benefits of Collaborative Learning<\/h2>\n<p>Scager et al. (2016) note that there are decades of literature that demonstrate the positive effects of collaborative learning on academic success. In one such article, Laal and Ghodsi (2012) compiled and categorized the benefits of collaborative learning found in the literature between 1964-2010. The noted benefits were divided into four overarching categories to include social, psychological, academic, and assessment.<\/p>\n<p><b>Social<\/b>: Collaborative learning creates a support system for students as they work through challenges together. The group work also facilitates learning communities while improving student&#8217;s\u00a0understanding of diverse viewpoints and strengthening cooperation.<\/p>\n<p><b>Psychological<\/b>: Learner-centered instruction improves self-confidence in the learner and working on problems together can help lessen feelings of anxiety for students. Affectively, collaborative learning efforts may lead to more &#8220;positive attitudes towards teachers&#8221;.<br \/>\n<b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Academic:\u00a0<\/b>Collaborative learning creates a student-centered approach to learning, fosters higher-order thinking and facilitates problem-solving skills.<br \/>\n<b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Assessment:\u00a0<\/b>Collaborative learning efforts use a multitude of assessment techniques.<\/p>\n<p>Falcione et al. (2019) add that collaborative learning leads to a mastery of course content and the cultivation of interpersonal skills that benefit the student outside of the classroom environment.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In collaborative learning, the metacognitive ability of participants is improved due to the absence of a professor&#8217;s help throughout the process; learners must turn to each other, or outside sources, to overcome barriers, encouraging recognition of their own misunderstandings.\u00a0(Davidson &amp; Major, 2014 as cited by Falcione et al, 2019).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><b>Benefits Specific to Online Collaborative Learning<\/b><br \/>\nRoberts (2004) describes additional benefits specific to collaborative learning in the online environment. Examples include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none\">\n<ul>\n<li>Quiet students may open up.<\/li>\n<li>Little off-task behavior.<\/li>\n<li>The asynchronous nature of discussions fosters deeper responses.<\/li>\n<li>Students can use technology tools to access additional information.<\/li>\n<li>Few student disruptions.<\/li>\n<li>The content of online discussions can be retrieved at a later time.<\/li>\n<li>Discussions can extend across the term.<\/li>\n<li>Online learning creates an environment that supports the instructor\u2019s role as facilitator.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Challenges with Collaborative Learning<\/h2>\n<p>While there are many documented benefits of collaborative learning, this strategy also comes with its fair share of challenges. One such challenge includes the &#8220;cognitive costs of coordinating and collaborating with others&#8221; (Nokes-Malach et al., 2015, p. 647). In other words, if an individual member can solve the problem independently, then they are not likely to benefit from collaborative efforts and may even perform worse as a result of trying to coordinate many varied ideas (Nokes-Malach et al, 2015 as cited by Nokes-Malach et al., 2012). This notion also applies to less complex activities where little is gained from group collaboration. Group members benefit when the task is complex, i.e. &#8220;high cognitive load&#8221;, and parts can be distributed among the group.<\/p>\n<p>Other potential challenges described by Nokes-Malach et al. (2015) include \u201cretrieval strategy disruption&#8221; and &#8220;production blocking&#8221;. The former concept occurs when one person loses their train of thought because they are paying attention to other group members, while the latter refers to the practice of allowing others to finish speaking before attempting to speak. This example can lead to &#8220;missed retrieval opportunities&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>A third example includes &#8220;social loafing&#8221; which describes the phenomenon where one group member may not contribute at the same level because they believe other group members may help &#8220;pick up the slack&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>A fourth, and final challenge is of collaborative learning is &#8220;fear of evaluation&#8221;. Here, students may avoid sharing ideas out of fear of judgment from their group members (Nokes-Malach et al., 2015).<\/p>\n<p>Johnson and Johnson (2009, as cited by Nokes-Malach et al., 2015) propose that the latter two examples may occur when there is a lack of individual accountability or positive interdependence\u00a0among group members as described earlier in this review.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s important to note that there are also drawbacks related more specifically to online collaborative learning efforts. One such drawback involves some of the online collaboration tools used. Tarun (2019) discusses\u00a0the inadequacies of such tools to include a lack of features that may improve usability as well as the inability to customize some tools to meet classroom, instructor, or school needs.<\/p>\n<p>Appavoo et al. (2019) add that collaborative learning efforts in online courses\u00a0can be difficult to coordinate\u00a0for learners, as some are\u00a0also balancing\u00a0professional and family-related commitments.<\/p>\n<h2>Implications for Future Work<\/h2>\n<p>In order to overcome some of the common challenges of collaborative learning and maximize benefits, it is important to adhere to the recommendations that have emerged from the research on collaborative learning efforts (Scager et al., 2016).<\/p>\n<p>The first factor that instructors should keep in mind when implementing collaborative learning efforts is to use a small group size (Scager et al., 2016). Three to five students per group is recommended to maximize efficacy (<em>Cooperative learning classroom.research<\/em>, n.d.).<\/p>\n<p>Another factor to consider is group composition. Groups comprised of members with diverse perspectives have been shown to increase learning in group work (Kozhevnikov et al., 2014). It is interesting to note that mixed ability groups tend to benefit lower ability students and may not benefit higher ability students (Webb et al, 2002). What may be even more important when it comes to learning, however, is equal participation among group members regardless of \u201cability\u201d. When all students participate equally, they are more likely to fully utilize each member\u2019s unique skillsets and contributions (Woolley et al., 2015).<\/p>\n<p>A third factor to consider is the nature of the task itself. For collaborative learning efforts to be most successful, tasks should be both complex and appropriate for the\u00a0topic at hand. The task should also allow students to create unique work with autonomy and self-regulation (Scager et al., 2016), but within a structure or framework to guide collaborative learning efforts (Appavoo et al., 2019).<\/p>\n<p>Last, but not least, for collaboration to be successful, social interaction is imperative (Volet et al., 2009). The process of discussing, debating, and explaining ideas to one another, as well as building off of others&#8217; ideas helps to facilitate metacognition (Scager et al., 2016).<\/p>\n<h2>Gaps and Conclusions<\/h2>\n<p>While the concept of collaborative learning certainly isn&#8217;t new, collaborative learning in a digital environment is for many teachers and students. With the advances in technology as well as the increase in quantity and quality of digital tools available, there is great potential for the future of online learning. To get to that point, however, it will be important to address some of the gaps in the existing literature.<\/p>\n<p>Research efforts for this review uncovered fewer articles related specifically to online collaborative learning when compared to collaborative learning in the traditional classroom setting. Chang and Hannafin (2015) add that it will be important to consider the unique traits of adult-learners and the impact that online collaboration tools may have on learning\u00a0for this group.<\/p>\n<p>Tarun (2019) notes that research on\u00a0educational technology tools most often includes tests of quality,\u00a0to include &#8220;functionality and usability&#8221;, but fail to evaluate the effects of integration into the online classroom.\u00a0In future research, it will be important to consider\u00a0if and how the technology\u00a0tools used for collaboration are actually accomplishing what educators believe they are accomplishing.<\/p>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<p><em>Active and Collaborative Learning | University of Maryland<\/em>\u2014<em>Teaching and Learning<\/em>\u00a0<em>Transformation Center<\/em>. (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2020, from https:\/\/tltc.umd.edu\/active-and-collaborative-learning<\/p>\n<p>Bates, A. W. (Tony). (2015). 4.4 Online collaborative learning. In\u00a0<em>Teaching in a Digital Age<\/em>. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https:\/\/opentextbc.ca\/teachinginadigitalage\/chapter\/6-5-online-collaborative-learning\/<\/p>\n<p>Boundless (2015, July 21). Advantages of using technology in the classroom.\u00a0<em>Boundless Education<\/em>. Retrieved from http:\/\/oer2go.org\/mods\/en-boundless\/www.boundless.com\/education\/textbooks\/boundless-education- textbook\/technology-in-the-classroom-6\/edtech-25\/advantages-of-using-technology-in-the-classroom-77- 13007\/index.html<\/p>\n<p>Chang, Eunice &amp; Hannafin, M. J. (2015). The uses (and misuses) of collaborative distance education technologies: Implications for the debate on transience in technology. <em>Quarterly Review of Distance Education<\/em>,\u00a0<em>16<\/em>(2), 77\u201392.<\/p>\n<p><em>Constructivism<\/em>. (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2020, from http:\/\/www.buffalo.edu\/ubcei\/enhance\/learning\/constructivism.html<br \/>\n<em>Cooperative learning classroom.research<\/em>. (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2020, from http:\/\/alumni.media.mit.edu\/~andyd\/mindset\/design\/clc_rsch.html<\/p>\n<p>EDsmart. (2015, December 29).\u00a0<em>50 free online collaboration tools for educators<\/em>.\u00a0 https:\/\/www.edsmart.org\/50-free-online-collaboration-tools-for-educators\/<\/p>\n<p>Falcione, S., Campbell, E., McCollum, B., Chamberlain, J., Macias, M., Morsch, L., &amp; Pinder, C. (2019). Emergence of different perspectives of success in collaborative learning.\u00a0<em>Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning<\/em>,\u00a0<em>10<\/em>(2). https:\/\/eric.ed.gov\/?id=EJ1227390<\/p>\n<p>Kozhevnikov, M., Evans, C., &amp; Kosslyn, S. M. (2014). Cognitive style as environmentally sensitive individual differences in cognition: A modern synthesis and applications in education, business, and management.\u00a0<em>Psychological Science in the Public Interest<\/em>,\u00a0<em>15<\/em>(1), 3\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1529100614525555<\/p>\n<p>Laal, M., &amp; Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning.\u00a0<em>Procedia &#8211; Social and Behavioral Sciences<\/em>, 31, 486\u2013490. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sbspro.2011.12.091<\/p>\n<p>Muller, K., Gradel, K., Forte, M., McCabe, R., Pickett, A. M., Piorkowski, R., Scalzo, K., &amp; Sullivan, R. (n.d.).\u00a0<em>Assessing Student Learning in the Online Modality<\/em>. 32.<\/p>\n<p>Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., &amp; Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning.\u00a0<em>Educational Psychology Review<\/em>,\u00a0<em>27<\/em>(4), 645\u2013656. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10648-015-9312-8<\/p>\n<p>Roberts, T. S. (2004).\u00a0<em>Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice<\/em>. Idea Group Inc (IGI).<\/p>\n<p>Scager, K., Boonstra, J., Peeters, T., Vulperhorst, J., &amp; Wiegant, F. (2016). Collaborative learning in higher education: Evoking positive interdependence.\u00a0<em>CBE Life Sciences Education<\/em>,\u00a0<em>15<\/em>(4). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1187\/cbe.16-07-0219<\/p>\n<p>Tarun, I. M. (2019). The Effectiveness of a Customized Online Collaboration Tool for Teaching and Learning.\u00a0<em>Journal of Information Technology Education: Research<\/em>, 18, 275\u2013292.<\/p>\n<p>TeachThought. (2019, June 9).\u00a0<em>30 Of the best digital collaboration tools for students<\/em>.\u00a0 https:\/\/www.teachthought.com\/technology\/12-tech-tools-for-student-to-student-digital-collaboration\/<\/p>\n<p>Volet, S., Summers, M., &amp; Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?\u00a0<em>Learning and Instruction<\/em>,\u00a0<em>19<\/em>(2), 128\u2013143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001<\/p>\n<p><em>What is Cooperative Learning?<\/em>\u00a0(n.d.). Cooperative Learning. Retrieved April 3, 2020, from https:\/\/serc.carleton.edu\/introgeo\/cooperative\/whatis.html<\/p>\n<p>Writers, S. (2018, February 14).\u00a0<em>Current Trends in Online Education<\/em>. TheBestSchools.Org. https:\/\/thebestschools.org\/magazine\/current-trends-online-education\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As an instructor in a fully online program, I often use group work as a means to increase engagement and facilitate a connection in the online classroom. In some classes, I ask students to work in groups on individual assignments,&#8230; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/2020\/05\/07\/online-collaborative-learning-in-higher-education\/\">Continue Reading &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3228,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5,6],"class_list":["post-85","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-strategies-for-online-learning","tag-collaborative-learning","tag-cooperative-learning"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3228"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/edspace.american.edu\/amytrietiak\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}]