“The task of building and maintaining a team is never done”
In Leading the autobiography of Sir Alex Ferguson with collaboration of Michael Moritz. This type of phrase contributes to building of a team with simple language. The readers of a soccer manager do not tend to be erudite philophers, insetad they are soccer fans that try to work on leadership skills or simply love this type of sport.
“You learn the essence of libertarianism in kindergarten:
Don’t hit other people,
Don’t take their stuff,
And keep your promises.” (Boaz 145)
In The Libertarian Mind, David Boaz introduces the libertarian mindset to new readers. The rhetoric of this book is set to captivate new audience and add adepts to this philosophy. In this particular fragment Boaz makes the text approachable to every reader. Brilliantly he understands the rules every kindergarten receives and creates a text that is approachable to all the audiences. The importance of the text is that it contributes to the deeper understanding of a wide arrange of audiences.
At the trial, he never gave an inch when it came to this part of the story, although he agreed that today, when “times have changed so much,” the Jews might not be too happy to recall this “pulling together and he did not want “to hurt their feelings.” (Arendt 48)
Hannah Arendt in her book Eichmann in Jerusalem narrates the trial of Adolf Eichmann one of the most prominent figure of Nazism in WW2. He was the Nazi SS-Obersturmbannführe, he planned many of the atrocities and human rights violations the Nazi regime perpetrated in their 12 year Reich. Hannah Arendt was highly criticized due to the tone and the rhetoric used in this book. Arendt spoke without any slant toward the Nazi official, she was highly impartial and did not portray the man as a monster. She was in pursuit of a more noble cause, explore the banality of evil. This exert caught my attention due to its irony. In this part of the book Arendt is describing the plan Eichmann tried to develop of granting a sovereign state to the Jewish populous far away from mutterland. Eichmann approved mass deportations and even affirmed it was good for the economy to take control over jewish businesses this way. So it results quite ironic that after committing those atrocities he would not talk about it to prevent “hurting the feelings” of the Jewish population. In this passage Arendt incorporates three quotes from Eichmann in his trial; is imperative to remark how the author skillfully constructs the sentence. Quoting those precise words of Eichmann enriches her argument and makes a strong point. I added a link of a fragment of Eichmann trial in Jerusalem.
Phil Casey “Potter’s House is Still a Home for Everyone.” The Washington Post, Times Herald (1959-1973), Mar 07, 1971, pp. 2, ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Washington Post, http://proxyau.wrlc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.proxyau.wrlc.org/docview/148213481?accountid=8285.
In “Potter’s House is Still a Home for Everyone,” Phil Casey claims that Potter’s House stands true to the principals it was created. More specifically, he tells the story of when the coffee house was created and how it continues that legacy eleven years later. The first couple of paragraphs talk about Reverend N. Gordon Cosby creating the coffeehouse and how a visit to a New England tavern took them to open such a place instead of a traditional church. Consequently, the coffee house began a trend that spread throughout the entire country. Throughout the piece it is mention that one of the goals of the coffee shop was to “rebuild the city”. At that particular time Washington DC was a deeply fractured city and there were few multicultural commonplaces. At Potter’s House they received “wide range of subjects, political, social, economic, cultural and religious.” In other words, everyone was welcomed there. It was not common that in the beginning of 1970s there was a business that took pride of social mixing. That’s what makes Potter’s House such an iconic landmark for Adams Morgan, Washington DC and the whole country.
This is one of the best sources I have found for this project. It contains many key quotes that will be helpful to implement when in conversation with other sources. For example, “Christ would have been more at home in the coffee house”. This quotes ties together the two main places of my commonplace, the coffee house and the Church of the Savior. This type of quotes can incorporate the two branches of my research. Potter’s House as a commonplace that brought a huge cultural impact to Adams Morgan and the Church of the Savior efforts to innovate in religious spaces. Also, this piece is highly adaptive for prospective sources, it permits me to have a great array of fields that connect with it.
Sandra Evans Washington Post,Staff Writer. “Congregation Marks Rare Reunion.”The Washington Post (1974-Current file), Oct 26, 1987, pp. 2, ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Washington Post,
In “Congregation Marks Rare Reunion,” Sandra Evans explains how the ecumetical Church of Savior celebrates 40 years of its founding. She continues to chronologically tell the different social projects the church has done at Adams Morgan since it arrived to Washington DC. It begins with the “acclaimed” Jubilee Housing that with the help of James Rouse a famous real estate developer began renovating apartment buildings and keeping them low income properties. Following that, it mentions another separate branch of the church, Potter’s House cafe. The last two projects that were marching at that particular time frame where the Columbia Road Health Services Clinic and Jubilee Jobs. Mary Cosby the wife of Reverend Cosby noted that “When you get people housing, you realize they have no jobs; so you get them jobs, and then realize they have no health care”. In other words, Cosby realized how is not sufficient to only provide housing for a person to be totally well off, people need jobs and healthcare too. At that time the church was looking to expand its samaritan activities to wider fronts. This included sheltering refugees from Central America, sending volunteers to Calcutta to work with Mother Theresa and creating Samaritan Inns to house homeless. The Church of the Savior has contributed to building a more equal society with the hands of few but passionate volunteers.
Potter’s House will not exist if it wasn’t for the caritative work of the Church of The Saviour. It is important to know the work this institution made and the impact it had on both the Washington DC and the world community. This source will enter the conversation perfectly complementing the information of enumenical churches and the work they have done in Adams Morgan. Is necessary for the correct mapping of Potter’s House commonplace to incorporate the philanthropic work of the church that runs the establishment. Also, all the
Lily Percy. “Pastor, Mentor And Social Activist: Remembering Gordon Cosby.” Remembrances WAMU 88.5
In “Pastor, Mentor And Social Activist: Remembering Gordon Cosby,” Lily Percy celebrates the life of Pastor Gordon N. Cosby. In this obituary note, Percy gathers statements from a wide array of friends of Reverend Cosby. Cosby founded the first interracial Church in Washington DC and devoted his life to social change in the city. He made a huge impact to the community around him. Jim Wallis a prominent Christian writer said, “Many people have never heard of him, but he shaped the vocations of so many of us that he shaped the church more than any pastor of his generation.” In other words, Wallis beliefs that Cosby was one of the most influential reverends of that time period in America. His lifelong work was impacting community culture.
I plan to use Lily Percy obituary note on Reverend Gordon Cosby as an exhibit of all the positive actions done by this great man. The testimonies of his friends and specialists on religion will be put in conversation with argumentative and methodic sources. It is important to situate this type of quotes with historic facts that validate the work done by Reverend Cosby in Adams Morgan. Potters House is one of the most tangible representations of his life work.
Doubt, Keith. “The Rhetoric of History.” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 95, no. 2, 1989, pp. 221–238., www.jstor.org/stable/2780954.
In “The Rhetoric of History,” Allan Megill and Donald N. McCloskey explore the rhetoric used to write history and persuade them. More categorically, how history is worded to act as a form of persuasion. For example, behind of the rhetoric used in history there is a “dependence on value, judgement and individual insight.” (221) In other words, Megill and McCloskey believe that there is a certain change in the way history is written due to personal biases from historians. For both authors, history that is not written with rhetoric loses the true conversation of humankind.
In the Build Environment Analysis project I have worked with many historical sources. After reading “The Rhetoric of History,” I learned how they should be treated when brought in conversation with each other. Historians have a great importance in the way history transcends and how is understood in future generations. There is a considerable amount of ambiguity in historical writings, that is something I should take into account when working on the analysis. Rhetoric is a fundamental part of history writing and being resilient about that idea will be naive.
“An Interview with Gordon Cosby: Co-Founder of the Church of the Saviour.” Family and Community Ministries, vol. 21, no. 2, Sept. 2007, pp. 32-35. EBSCOhost, proxyau.wrlc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rfh&AN=ATLA0001624725&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
In “An Interview With Gordon Cosby,” a group of Baylor social workers and seminary students interview Gordon Cosby. Cosby was the Co- founder of The Church of the Saviour, the institution that founded and runs Potter’s House Cafe. In an spiritual dialogue Cosby talks about the understanding he has about Christianity, poverty, cultural injustice, among other matters. All of this dialogue is centered towards Washington DC. For example, he says “Today, we are an educated nation, but our city is tragic.” (33) In this passage, Cosby mentions how the situation of the city is terrible, taking into account how the United States is an educated system. Some of the causes are the terrible education in public schools and social inequality. For Cosby, Washington DC should be a city filled with love, that responds to the necessities of all its people not only the elites.
Reverend Gordon N. Cosby is the main figure of my research, thanks to his passion and community service he positively impacted Washington DC. Getting a primary source for my research grants credibility and depth. This interview will enter nicely to the conversation because it will contribute with first hand information. Also, it is important to analyze the rhetoric he uses in his responses to corroborate the narrative of historic documents.
In “The Rhetorical Situation,” Lloyd F. Bitzer explores the nature in which speakers and writers create rhetorical discourse. More specifically, Bitzer mentions how meaning- context is fundamental for human communication. Also, he explores a formal definition, examines the constituents of a rhetorical situation and how it invites for change. For example, he explains that “Prior to the creation and presentation of discourse, there are three constituents for a rhetorical situation: exigence, audience and constraints.” (6) In this passage, Bitzer mentions for the first time the three constituents of the rhetorical situation. He then proceeds to mention throughout the essay the general characteristics and features of each one. For Bitzer, speech only becomes rhetorical when it responds to a rhetorical situation and includes the three constituents.
This essay is one of the most complex sources I have encountered so far in my research. This piece is one of the most important pieces in the field of rhetoric, incorporating it to my Build Environment Analysis will give a more erudite tone. I plan to use it as a method for analyzing other sources and to see how they approach the three constituents of a rhetorical situation. Analyzing the exigence, audience and constraints will allow me to correctly understand the rhetorical meaning of each source. Also, it will lead me to effectively set them in conversation with each other and to deeply understand the rhetorical situations involving my commonplace.
Lloyd, James M. “Fighting Redlining and Gentrification in Washington, D.C.” Journal of Urban History, vol. 42, no. 6, Nov. 2016, pp. 1091-1109.
In “Fighting Redlining and Gentrification in Washington, DC: The Adams- Morgan Organization and Tenant Right to Purchase,” James M. Lloyd proofs how the right to purchase legislation provided legal guarantees for community organizations to prevent redlining and gentrification. More specifically, Lloyd explores the impact this piece of legislation had on the demographics of Adams Morgan. For example, Lloyd explains “In 1973, the District of Columbia was granted home rule by Congress. This grant of self determination gave its majority African American population control of the city’s politics overnight.” (1095) In this passage, Lloyd mentions the important and rapid effect right to purchase legislation had on the political opportunity for African American communities.
In my study I have noticed the vast multiculturalism Adams Morgan has, it is important for me to understand the cultural shifts throughout Adams Morgan history. This study of the impact of right to purchase legislation will serve as an exhibit for mapping my commonplace. The type of data the document poses will be placed in conversation with more theoretical sources to find the perfect framework of theoretical and practical information.
After reading the eight chapter of City of Rhetoric, finally I discovered why the book has the word Rhetoric in its title. David Fleming is not a sociologist or an urban developer he has an academic background teaching rhetoric. That’s why he wrote this book, even though certain elements of the categories mentioned before are present in the text. In the first paragraph of the chapter Fleming acknowledges how the book so far could be read as “a local history lesson or a seminar in urban sociology than an analysis of situated discourse practices” (179). Basically, Fleming understands how a good portion of his readers could be reading this text and mentions how in the coming chapters he will concentrate
in the rhetoric part of his book.
Fleming proceeds to review some of the examples he has mentioned in the book and how they could appear to be completely different they have the same problems. For example, ghettos and suburbs both are marked by being “decentralized, fragmented and polarized”. They are the opposite of what Fleming calls “commonplaces”, places that are centralized, integrated and equitable (180). That type of place is the ideal to properly build public discourse. The problem with the other type is that some factors such as, isolation, fear and silence impede the inhabitants of proper public discourse. Also, it creates no human scale and all the problems that derive from it, “prejudice, mistrust and social alienation” (182).
In the previous chapters Fleming presents various places in Chicago that have certain characteristics like the ones “commonplaces” require. Even though he mentions this places not even one has was its needed to be consider fully a “commonplace”. Fleming is highly skeptic of this places because they don’t contain all the characteristics needed, “accessibility, density, diversity, publicity and sovereignty” (185). He remarks how the most important of those are accessibility and diversity. Both are necessary for effective public discourse; he mentions how in some parts of Europe there are places that have both requirements and how radically different the set ups are compared to the ones in the United States.
Fleming concentrates in this chapter to mold his arguments and relate them to rhetoric. All the examples he used previously are explained and contextualize for rhetoric purposes. I’m anxious to know what are the ways Fleming beliefs as a society we could bring opportunities to marginalized parts of cities.