Within the world of social media, the audience pulls the strings. However, does this mean that we the audience are the form of persuasion? Are we the root of online/social rhetoric. The answer is a simple yes, we are the source of all our rhetoric on social media. However with such rhetoric, there is a tendency that the audience may not use such rhetoric correctly, therefore not entirely reach the audience. This is a massive topic with hundreds of documented techniques, concepts, and descriptors. Yet even the basics of Aristotelian rhetoric can help marketers assess and deconstruct their successes and failures in social media communication. The idea of rhetoric within social media deems true as you can see prime examples of celebrities “promoting” products or endorsing brands; to persuade the audience a certain way. However, this can be an issue because not all people can use this rhetoric properly and end up losing their audience. The ongoing influx of rhetoric within our social media is quite interesting to study and figure out.
Rhetoric Within the “Real World”
Within our society, we see rhetoric and persuasion all around us. Our society is full of persuasive information to relate ourselves with a product or particular material. The concepts of rhetoric tend to be applied through the uses of ethos, logos, and pathos to contend to a wide audience population. This tends to be targeted at various focus groups and audiences to bring about a sense of “brand loyalty”. The use of persuasion tends to be within advertisements focusing on clothing, food, or skincare/makeup. Within the studies of rhetoric within literature, you learn that the use of this writing is meant to persuade the writer to believe the writers argument. This can be true within marketing and advertising. Such political advertising in D.C. bring about a sense of nationalism, morale to the city.