Nobel prize laureate in literature, Samuel Beckett, mentions failure as an inevitable component in improving in his work “Worstward Ho!”. In it Beckett writes,“Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.”; the significance of this paragraph is because Beckett conveys an unusual message is often not accredited to failure. The paragraph promote tenacity, and Beckett does not allow failure to derail an individual from pursuing or trying again. On the contrary, Beckett encourages an individual to keep on pursuing by placing a positive connotation to failure, by humanizing it. For instance, his use of anaphora, “Ever tried. Ever failed.”, places emphasis on both “tried” and “failed”, later used as an anaphora in the last three sentences. Use of the period in this entire paragraph is being used as a tool in emphasizing a statement, as if there is no room for questioning. Perhaps, the simple structure must with the topic of the paragraph that failure is as simple and normal as his simple sentence structure. However, I do believe Beckett strategically chose to use simple sentence structure over commas, exclamation point, question marks, or other forms of punctuation as a strategic move on his behalf. For instance, if he placed two question marks for the first two sentences and exclamation points for each sentence would drastically transform the paragraphs’ relationship to “Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter! Try again! Fail again! Fail better! “. The transformed sentence is no longer emphasizing the first two sentences as statement, but now changes the relationship of simple structure to a rhetorical one, and it is followed by commands that are expressed through exclamation points. Both simple and rhetorical/ exclaiming structures assume the author’s audience has tried and failed, but the transformed version demands and pressures his audience, unlike the simple structure which simply states the entire phrase as a truth.
If the formatting was in DC, IC form the relationship and meaning of the sentence would look a bit like, “Ever tried, ever failed, but no matter try again, fail again, and fail better.” Frankly Beckett’s original version offers a sense of emphasis where it is needed, and it perhaps more effective in conveying his message of normalizing failure because it does not question or demand anything of his audience. His message has lived on since his publishing “Worstward Ho!” in 1983, and has transcended into different electronic social media platforms creating the hashtag, #Failbetter, which I would be inclined to argue would have not caught on if Beckett placed exclamation points at the end of his two sentences, because individuals attempting to improve a lifestyle don’t want to feel like they are being told to do so. The father of successful failures and failing better was strategic in being conscious of his audience, and understood improving or modifying a particular behavior is to be empathetic rather than be demanding. The phrase has had such an impact that there was a FAIL BIG event on March 28th, where fail tales were drawn from artists, musicians, and scientists social media platforms. Some food for thought: if Beckett would have not used simple structure, would the lives it has impacted thus far be Vietcong failure with a positive connotation.