Categories
Samuel E Evans

“The Foreign Spell” by Iyer, The Grand Tour by Towner

Progym: Encomium

           Pico Iyer describes how he is “always foreign,” or brings with him a sense of foreignness almost wherever in the world he goes. He was born in England to Indian parents, and spent much of his early life in California, feeling doubly out of place there and not feeling at home with any of his three possibly identities. Iyer is of Hindu origin, and he describes his possible personal connection to Bali or the Ganges in India, but again he says,

“everywhere I knew was foreign, which meant that nearly everywhere had the power to unsettle and surprise me, forever,”

which is the essence of what Iyer writes of in this piece (Iyer).

           Iyer attended school in England, and he describes “flying alone over the North Pole six times a year” to attend first preparatory school and then Oxford University, all while still living with his parents in California (Iyer). This also must contribute to Iyer’s eternal foreignness, his early disconnect from any kind of solid, familial home. This could be disastrous for a young person, but Iyer seems to imply that it was more freeing and enlightening, allowing him to have the perspective he now employs. Iyer was also raised on the road beyond just this, so to speak, as he talks about spending months traveling, continent to continent. He says that

“the door to the world was swinging open for those of us ready to live rough and call ourselves foreigners for life” (Iyer).

           All of this, alongside his formal education and being raised by a political theorist father and being from a line of writers and thinkers, seems to have led Iyer to want to reexamine travel, and tourism, through a new lens, a critical and picture-perfect lens. He describes how the world has become smaller, yet not less diverse or more homogenized as some may claim. Instead, the world has only changed along the lines it was already coursing. He writes about how Bali has changed, now equally full of fast-food and beachfront resorts as temples and shrines, but that it is not “spoiled” as some may say. He writes that

“this is what the island has been tempting every visitor to say since the beginning,”

and the visual alterations hardly detract from how wonderfully foreign it continues to be (Iyer).

           Iyer’s writing continues to portray travel in a new light, as not ruining the world while seeing it, but rather continuing to find new ways that the world is worth traveling. We are not becoming more monotonous and uniform, but rather we are adapting alongside one another in a multitude of different and amazing ways. In this way, you could compare Iyer’s work to Steinbeck, who writes about the trials and hardships of the American man, but not to say that America is terrible, but to say why it is worthwhile. Through critical analysis, thought, and storytelling you can come to see each’s perspective and see how their respective subjects are multifaceted and dynamic. Much as the West is in turmoil during The Grapes of Wrath, the world travel writers describe is being massively altered by globalization and the tourism industry. But the argument in from both Steinbeck and Iyer is that this doesn’t mean they are being ruined, but much the opposite. Iyer says that what we see now is a continuation of culture, of new things being born along the lines of what came before, and this only makes it more worth seeing.

5 replies on ““The Foreign Spell” by Iyer, The Grand Tour by Towner”

This is a great explanation of Iyer’s main theme in his writing. I think you really captured his point of foreignness and how it has impacted his life in a positive way. Your summary of Iyer’s writing also does a really great job at showing how the events in his life influenced him into being the person he is today. For example, when you mentioned his “political theorist father” and then used it to show why Iyer wants to travel. I like how you mentioned the different perspectives of travel writers in your last paragraph, I think it really shows the diversity of each individual.

Sam, this is excellent work! I appreciate the research/care that you bring to your encomium. I have a couple thoughts. First, I can’t help but wonder a little bit what inspired an encomium of Iyer–unless, that is, you are truly a fan of his. I would probably reserve that progym for figures that you truly are inspired by or want to praise–whether that be somebody mentioned within a work, somebody the work reminds you of, or, yes, the author him/herself. But really, that’s just a minor quibble–the point is that I want you to be sure to think strategically about matching the different progym exercises to the reading, based on what the reading inspires in you. Also, watch the formatting. Formatting also has rhetorical effects, and impacts upon the meaning/ethos of a piece. With the test flush to the left like that it’s difficult to read. So in short, think about how formatting too has rhetorical effects–you should even try out some different formatting moves meaningfully (that is, considering how formatting relates to the message/meaning of your blog).

This post really encompassed much of what Iyer’s beliefs were in both this reading and the one from last class. Your analysis touched on many different aspects of Iyer’s identity and how his foreignness related to all of them. I thought it was interesting how you pointed out that many others would have felt disastrous effects from the life Iyer was living but he somehow felt enlightened and truly embrace his eternal foreignness.

I found this to be an extremely well thought out analysis about how Iyer views the world and the way we write about travel. I especially enjoyed your last bit about Steinbeck and Iyer’s commonalities within their writing. It honestly makes me want to read The Grapes of Wrath again (the first time I did not enjoy, but now I think I might). I enjoy this picture-perfect lens you point out he looks at travel through, and I think I might start doing that as well for the future readings we have for this class. You’ve really pushed me in a new directoin, thank you!

I found your post very informative and with a strong explanation of how Iyers experiences have shaped what he now believes in and its his main theme of writing. You also mentioned Iyers eternal foreignness because of his disconection with his family, and this is something I did not thought of. Foreignness can be seen in many different aspects of life, not only through travel. Lastly, I liked how you analyzed and compared Iyers and Steinbecks work, making your writing more clear.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.