Month: October 2017

Quantitative Data Source Discussion

I am exploring why environmental degradation is continuing despite pressure from international institutions to make drastic and immediate changes. I have begun exploring the data set ForesSTAT from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO). Considering the importance of forests to environmental and economic health, it may be a useful tool in understanding the larger puzzle of continued environmental degradation. Forestry is important environmentally to biodiversity, anti-air pollution, and water purification. Economically, products from forests can bolster a countries economy by selling both raw and finished goods into national and global markets. This broad database has various sections, this one focusing on forestry production and trade. The most recent data is from this year and some variables trace back to 1961. The data-set contains information to some extent on all 217 countries. They focus on the examination of production, import and export quantities and values in regards to forestry. The dataset breaks these concepts down by examining the various uses of forest products including wood fuel, industrial round-wood, logs, pulpwood, sawn wood, chemical wood pulp, paper products, household products among a few others. Understanding the products will help understand their worth. ForesSTAT also allows you to examine trade flows. If this method is chosen to be the best in exploring this puzzle, material that is not found within this database would include ranking the importance of products that are produced by deforestation are to the economic well-being of a country. Another, the rather obvious limitation, is examining if territories are grouped with their “motherland” or alone. It is vital that there is standardization between datasets when examining trends across countries. UN FAO also provides another dataset that allows examining countries physical forest coverage. In order to continue this research, I will need to examine another data set because ForesSTAT fails to show visually forest coverage over time.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “FAO Forestry Country Information.” Last modified 2017, accessed May 28, 2013,
http://www.fao.org/forestry/country/en/
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “Forestry Production and Trade.” Last modified 2017, accessed October 24, 2017, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “Forestry Trade Flows.” Last modified 2017, accessed October 24, 2017, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO

Article Comparison

The following comparison of Frito Dolisca’s et al. “Farmers’ Perceptions Towards Forests: A Case Study from Haiti” and Laurence Lewis’ and William Coffey’s “The Continuing Deforestation of Haiti” both describe the foundation of this conversation as an interdisciplinary study of deforestation and its relationship to Haitian economy. Dolisca’s et al. case study focuses on how a community member’s perception of the Foret des Pins Reserve impact social, environmental, and economic factors.1. This social psychological study attempts to break down and understand if environmental impacts are of concern or prioritized in Haitian culture. Lewis and Coffey’s research focuses on how economic issues are a direct result of environmental degradation associated with deforestation.2

This school of thought in which these researchers are concerned with is critical theory. As the international standard of development is becoming inescapable, Dolisca et al. are clearly concerned about how environmental changes will impact people’s views on the environment. Specifically, Dolisca et al. examine feelings and priorities of forests in everyday lives. Lewis and Coffey are concerned about how rural-to-urban migration, as a result of deforestation, will continue to suppress moral as employment opportunities do not increase.3

The conversation between these two pieces emphasizes not only the desire for change in deforestation practices but also the dire need for immediate change. Both articles will play a vital role in my research as they both set an important framework in understanding the economic implications of deforestation but also as they spark more questions that may be answered by other researchers. Regarding Dolisca’s et al. article, it will be vital to consider and examine how perceptions have changed in the last ten years since this research was published. The importance of forest is clearly of high concern in this case study because forest plays a vital role in food security and economic independence.4 Using statistical data of forest coverage in Haiti will allow me to pinpoint the most deforested and vulnerable areas. Before 1985 the coast of Haiti was heavily deforested and after 2000, deforestation moved inland.5 This data motivate me to conduct further examination on how this affected social relations between rural and urban areas in Haiti. Right now, after reading a couple articles on economics and deforestation, I am questioning the influence of culture. Continued research on both of these topics is necessary within the coming weeks.

    1. Frito Dolisca, Josh M. McDaniel and, Lawrence D. Teeter. “Farmers’ Perceptions Towards Forests: A Case Study from Haiti,” Forest Policy and Economics 9, 6 (2007). 704.
    2. Laurence A. Lewis and, William J Coffey. “The Continuing Deforestation of Haiti,” Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 14, 3 (1985), 158
    3. Lewis, 159.
    4. Dolisca, 708.
    5. Lewis, 159.

    Bibliography

    Dolisca, Frito, Josh M. McDaniel, Lawrence D. Teeter. “Farmers’ Perceptions Towards Forests: A Case Study from Haiti,” Forest Policy and Economics 9, 6 (2007). 704-7012.

    Lewis, Laurence A. and, William J Coffey. “The Continuing Deforestation of Haiti,” Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 14, 3 (1985), 158-160.