Now in Behavioral Neuroscience

Check out our latest preprint turned publication in Behavioral Neuroscience!

We used a progressive ratio licking task in which rats had to make increasing numbers of licks to receive liquid sucrose rewards. We determined what measures of progressive ratio performance are sensitive to value by testing rats with rewards containing 0%–16% sucrose. We found some measures (breakpoint, number of licking bouts) were sensitive to sucrose concentration and others (response rate, duration of licking bouts) were not. Inactivation of MFC had no effects on measures associated with value (e.g., breakpoint), but did alter behavioral measures associated with the pace of task performance (response rate and time to break). Our findings suggest that the medial frontal cortex has a role in maintaining task engagement, but not in the motivational control of action, in the progressive ratio licking task.

Figure 5, Swanson et al., 2019

K Swanson, HC Goldbach, M Laubach, (2019). The rat medial frontal cortex controls pace, but not breakpoint, in a progressive ratio licking task. Behavioral neuroscience 133 (4), 385

The future is open!

We just published a new commentary on the future of open-source tools for behavioral neuroscience, inspired by our work with!

There has been a recent and substantial increase in the use of open-source tools for conducting research studies in neuroscience. The OpenBehavior Project was created to disseminate open-source projects specific to the study of behavior. In this commentary, we emphasize the benefits of adopting an open-source mindset and highlight current methods and projects that give promise for open-source tools to drive advancement of behavioral measurement and ultimately understanding the neural basis of behavior.

Figure 1, White et al., 2019

SR White, LM Amarante, AV Kravitz, M Laubach, (2019). The Future is Open: Open-Source Tools for Behavioral Neuroscience Research. eNeuro, ENEURO. 0223-19.2019

Rodent PFC? a hot-take

Our latest review, What, if anything, is rodent prefrontal cortex? is now published in eNeuro!

Studies on prefrontal parts of the rodent cerebral cortex have appeared at an increasing rate in recent years. However, there has been no consensus on the terms used to describe the rodent prefrontal cortex (PFC) or how it relates to the PFC of monkeys and humans. To address these issues, we conducted a meta-analysis of publications on the PFC across species, a review of rodent brain atlases, a survey of PFC researchers on anatomic terms, and an analysis of how species differences in the corpus callosum might help relate PFC areas across species. Addressing these issues may help improve the clarity, rigor, and reproducibility of research on the rodent PFC.

Visual Abstract, Laubach et al., 2018

M Laubach, LM Amarante, K Swanson, SR White, (2018). What, if anything, is rodent prefrontal cortex? Eneuro 5 (5)

Preprint to Published!

Very exciting news! Our first preprint has made it to its final published form in the Journal of Neuroscience.

In our new work, we report evidence for a 6–12 Hz theta rhythm that is generated by the medial frontal cortex (MFC) and synchronized with ongoing consummatory actions. Previous studies of MFC reward signaling have inferred value coding upon temporally sustained activity during the period of reward consumption. Our findings suggest that MFC activity is temporally sustained due to the consumption of the rewarding fluids, and not necessarily the abstract properties of the rewarding fluid. Two other major findings were that the MFC reward signals persist beyond the period of fluid delivery and are generated by neurons within the MFC.

Figure 10, Amarante et al., 2017

LM Amarante, MS Caetano, M Laubach, (2017). Medial frontal theta is entrained to rewarded actions. Journal of Neuroscience 37 (44), 10757-10769

Our first preprint!

Today we posted our first preprint to bioRxiv!

How do we know the reward value of a given food or fluid? The item must first be consumed and only then can its relative value be computed. Here, we investigated the relationship between licking and reward signaling by the medial frontal cortex (MFC), a key cortical region for reward-guided learning and decision-making. Rats were tested in an incentive contrast procedure, in which they received alternating access to higher and lower value sucrose rewards. Neuronal activity in the MFC encoded the relative value of the ingested fluids, showing stronger entrainment to the lick cycle when animals ingested higher value rewards. The signals developed with experience, encoded the reward context, and depended on neuronal processing within the MFC. These findings suggest that consummatory behavior drives reward signaling in the MFC.

Figure 7, Amarante et al., 2017

LM Amarante, MA Caetano, M Laubach, (2017). Rhythmic Activity In The Medial Frontal Cortex Encodes Relative Reward Value. bioRxiv, 144550

Inhibitory control..

Check out the latest, a preview of Hardung et al., 2017 for Current Biology.

Functional anatomy in frontal cortex has been elusive and controversial. Here we preview a new study which combines neuronal ensemble recordings and optogenetics to map a functional gradient in rodent prefrontal cortex that supports inhibitory control.

Figure 1, Narayanan & Laubach, 2017

NS Narayanan, M Laubach, (2017). Inhibitory control: mapping medial frontal cortex. Current Biology 27 (4), R148-R150

Who regulates palatability? mPFC (through a lot of receptors)!

Our latest work is now published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience!

Here, we demonstrate that both systemic and mPFC infusions of the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine decreased the duration of licking bouts during access to high value sucrose solutions when provided alternating access to high and low value solutions. These results are similar to what has been previously reported following reversible inactivation of mPFC (Parent et al., 2015), and suggest that blocking mACh receptors with scopolamine disrupts the same elements of neuronal processing that is similarly affected by total cortical inactivation via muscimol. Exactly the opposite result was obtained when cholinergic tone was enhanced locally in mPFC with infusion of the cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine (aka eserine), activation of mAChR with the mAChR agonist oxotremorine, and blocking KCNQ channels linked to mAChR receptors with XE-991. Furthermore, infusion of ghrelin, which acts on the same KCNQ channels as the muscarinic system enhanced the same measure of palatability (bout duration) only when the high value sucrose solution was available. The present study is the first to implicate cholinergic and ghrelinergic signaling in the mPFC, acting through KCNQ channels, in the expression of palatability.

Figure 2, Parent et al., 2017

MA Parent, LM Amarante, K Swanson, M Laubach, (2017). Cholinergic and ghrelinergic receptors and KCNQ channels in the medial PFC regulate the expression of palatability. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 9, 284

Persistent licking and incentive contrast

In the latest issue of Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience we report on the role of medial prefrontal cortex in reward processing and the control of consummatory behaviors.

In this study we found that pharmacological inactivations of the mPFC, specifically the rostral part of the prelimbic area, greatly reduced intake of higher value fluid and only slightly increased intake of lower value fluid in an incentive contrast licking task. We also found rats licked equally for the high and low levels of sucrose at the beginning of the test sessions and “relearned” to reduce intake of the low value fluid over the test sessions. These effects were verified using optogenetic silencing of the same region and were distinct from inactivation of the ventral striatum, which simply increased overall intake. Our findings suggest that the mPFC is crucial for the maintenance of persistent licking and the expression of learned feeding strategies.

Figure 3, Parent et al., (2015).

MA Parent, LM Amarante, B Liu, D Weikum, M Laubach (2015). The medial prefrontal cortex is crucial for the maintenance of persistent licking and the expression of incentive contrast. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience 9, 23