Mentorship Log #7


Immediately after my meeting with Professor Esser on February 27, I ran over to class to have my peers review my methodology section draft of my final paper. I felt as though my methodology section was good at the time, but it definitely needed sharpening due to the fact that I had no idea exactly what my cases were going to be at that point. All that I could tell was that I was going through my statistical analysis and then I was going to interview stakeholders within my comparative cases. At this point, I became concerned with my methodology section, because I did not really have anything concretely down on my paper, where others did have concrete methods for how they were going to go about their work. I left this workshop feeling a bit downtrodden as the pressure of getting the research done started to really weigh down on me.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *